2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principal component analysis of d-prime values from sensory discrimination tests using binary paired comparisons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PCA is a multivariate pattern recognition method that can be applied to characterize a sensory profile and compare products [176]. Recent studies have considered other applications such as the acquisition of information about d-prime values across sensory attributes [103], the analysis of the impact of treatments on a product's shelf life, the detection of correlations between studied responses [177], and the contribution of product positioning with correct approaches or strategies [30]. More comprehensive statistical techniques have emerged in recent litera-ture, including LASSO-PCA (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, -principal component analysis) comprehensive evaluation for matcha sensory quality [178].…”
Section: Sensory Data Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PCA is a multivariate pattern recognition method that can be applied to characterize a sensory profile and compare products [176]. Recent studies have considered other applications such as the acquisition of information about d-prime values across sensory attributes [103], the analysis of the impact of treatments on a product's shelf life, the detection of correlations between studied responses [177], and the contribution of product positioning with correct approaches or strategies [30]. More comprehensive statistical techniques have emerged in recent litera-ture, including LASSO-PCA (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, -principal component analysis) comprehensive evaluation for matcha sensory quality [178].…”
Section: Sensory Data Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A nine-point hedonic scale is applied to assess acceptability. These kinds of ordinal data are usually analyzed by interval-scale data and paired t-test or ANOVA [103].…”
Section: Sensory Data Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative description analysis (QDA) is an effective method for food sensory evaluation, which can combine the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of food quality through multivariate analysis (Tan et al, 2020). Principal component analysis (PCA) is a full‐fledged quantitative description analysis method and a commonly used dimensionality reduction method in data processing (Granato, Santos, Escher, Ferreira, & Maggio, 2018; Linander, Bojesen Christensen, Cleaver, & Brockhoff, 2020). Besides, a few comprehensive indicators or factors can be used to replace many indicators or factors with strong correlation through this analysis method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Principal component analysis (PCA) is a full-fledged quantitative description analysis method and a commonly used dimensionality reduction method in data processing (Granato, Santos, Escher, Ferreira, & Maggio, 2018;Linander, Bojesen Christensen, Cleaver, & Brockhoff, 2020). Besides, a few comprehensive indicators or factors can be used to replace many indicators or factors with strong correlation through this analysis method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to accurately quantify relative acceptability from the paired preference test paradigm would be a key step forward in sensory testing for those who struggle with scale usage (e.g., children). Additionally, producing reliable numeric values from paired preference data can lead to the ability to implement other statistical tools commonly used, such as principal component analysis or clustering (Linander, Christensen, Cleaver, & Brockhoff, 2019). This study was designed to assess various methods of analyzing paired preference data and serves as a model for researchers looking for alternatives to nine‐point hedonic scales in assessing relative acceptability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%