2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-59478-1_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primate Habitat Acoustics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mobbing calls are structured to facilitate localisation of the caller [Marler, 1955], further supporting this function in ouah calls. Calls that are used in solitary situations are expected to show more stereotypical acoustic structures, as this counteracts attenuation in forest habitats [Mitani and Stuht, 1998;Brown and Waser, 2017]. The similarly structured chuck call showed high intra-call variability in cluster analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mobbing calls are structured to facilitate localisation of the caller [Marler, 1955], further supporting this function in ouah calls. Calls that are used in solitary situations are expected to show more stereotypical acoustic structures, as this counteracts attenuation in forest habitats [Mitani and Stuht, 1998;Brown and Waser, 2017]. The similarly structured chuck call showed high intra-call variability in cluster analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal vocalisations that have fixed structures are less susceptible to signal degradation when transmitted through dense, low-visibility habitats, such as forests [Waser and Brown, 1986;Marler and Mitani, 1988;Mitani and Stuht, 1998;Brown and Waser, 2017]. In taxa where vocal communication occurs without visual contact, as is often the case with solitary-living, nocturnal primates, vocal repertoires are expected to consist of highly stereotypical calls [Zimmermann, 1990;Ramanankirahina et al, 2016].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecologically, callers may exploit ideal sound transmission conditions. The Acoustic Adaptation Hypothesis predicts that animals may adjust their vocal signals to maximize signal transmission and minimize sound degradation, specifically within each environment in which calls occur (Waser & Waser, 1977;Ey & Fischer, 2009;Brown & Waser, 2017). Environmental metrics, such as temperature gradients, humidity and wind, vary with time of day, and can degrade signals, resulting in structural changes to the primary sound (Waser & Brown, 1984).…”
Section: Ecological Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the ecological selection for beak size affects acoustic divergence between different Darwin finch morphs reinforced by assortative mating. Further, acoustic adaptation to sound transmission characteristics of the environment, or ambient noise, has been shown to affect the structure of vocalizations (acoustic adaptation hypothesis; Brown & Waser, 2017) in insects, birds, anurans, and mammals (McNett & Cocroft, 2008; for review, see Boncoraglio & Saino, 2007, Ey & Fischer, 2009). For example, bird vocalizations have a lower maximum frequency in closed versus open habitats (Boncoraglio & Saino, 2007; Ey & Fischer, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, we tested whether ecology drives acoustic divergence to optimize transmission using forest type as a proxy of ecology. According to the literature in mammals, we predicted that species living in humid forest (closed habitats) have calls with a longer duration, more narrow band, and lower fundamental frequency than species living in dry forest (more open habitats; e.g., Brown & Waser, 2017; Ey & Fischer, 2009). Fourth, we investigated whether acoustic divergence may just reflect genetic drift.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%