2000
DOI: 10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1043::aid-tea2>3.3.co;2-j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary Teachers' thinking about the English National Curriculum for science: Autobiographies, warrants, and autonomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Katie's interactive knowledge bases grew, her teaching of science improved. Her knowledge of herself as a teacher became established as part of the way she thought about her planning, the purposes of science teaching, and the adaptation of curriculum resources (Lunn & Solomon, 2000). Hellden's (2003) study showed that science ideas are formed early in life, persist rather than be replaced, and are important in later conceptual development.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Katie's interactive knowledge bases grew, her teaching of science improved. Her knowledge of herself as a teacher became established as part of the way she thought about her planning, the purposes of science teaching, and the adaptation of curriculum resources (Lunn & Solomon, 2000). Hellden's (2003) study showed that science ideas are formed early in life, persist rather than be replaced, and are important in later conceptual development.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study of primary (elementary) teachers in the United Kingdom, Lunn and Solomon (2000) found that it was important for teachers to take ownership of curriculum making, as did Lisa, and to incorporate that into their personal identities as teachers. Teaching is less effective when subject matter and instructional practices are detached from the personal and professional identities of teachers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of the pilot data suggested that individual teachers' positions could be rich and complex, and were perhaps dependent on scienti c and social context (Lunn & Solomon, 2000). The systemic nets created for each individual were combined to give a new domain mapping, containing only those conceptualisations and distinctions enunciated by teachers in interview, which formed the basis for the design of the survey instrument and interview schedules used in the main project.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%