2005
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growing the tree of teacher knowledge: Ten years of learning to teach elementary science

Abstract: Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) is a much debated and studied construct. In this article, we adopt an all-embracing view of PCK to examine the development of one elementary science teacher's knowledge over a 10-year period. We portray this teacher's knowledge at three critical points in her career-as a student teacher, beginning teacher, and established teacher-and represent and analyze the growth of her science PCK using the metaphor of a knowledge tree. The tree metaphor shows that while science knowledg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0
8

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
56
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…While this third study was not a continuation of the second, it nonetheless provided a context in which to explore promising approaches for effective teacher education that could add to my prior findings. Preparing preservice teachers to effectively use curriculum materials is an important issue (Davis, 2006) as curriculum materials play a significant role in both shaping elementary science instruction and guiding beginning teachers (Ball & Feiman-Nemser, 1988;Grossman & Thompson, 2004;Kauffman, Johnson, Kardos, Lui, & Peske, 2002;Mulholland & Wallace, 2005). Unfortunately, many of the current materials are of poor quality (Kesidou & Roseman, 2002;Stern & Roseman, 2004).…”
Section: Study 3: Elementary Teachers and Curriculum Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this third study was not a continuation of the second, it nonetheless provided a context in which to explore promising approaches for effective teacher education that could add to my prior findings. Preparing preservice teachers to effectively use curriculum materials is an important issue (Davis, 2006) as curriculum materials play a significant role in both shaping elementary science instruction and guiding beginning teachers (Ball & Feiman-Nemser, 1988;Grossman & Thompson, 2004;Kauffman, Johnson, Kardos, Lui, & Peske, 2002;Mulholland & Wallace, 2005). Unfortunately, many of the current materials are of poor quality (Kesidou & Roseman, 2002;Stern & Roseman, 2004).…”
Section: Study 3: Elementary Teachers and Curriculum Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCK is interpreted in many different ways, often to suit the research context (Mulholland and Wallace 2005). For example, some researchers include knowledge of the curriculum (e.g., Grossman 1990), while others exclude this knowledge component (e.g., Cochran et al 1993).…”
Section: Pedagogical Content Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, most researchers who investigated teachers' PCK (e.g., De Jong et al 2005;Jones and Moreland 2004;Mulholland and Wallace 2005;Van Driel et al 1998) used multi method evaluations, a variety of techniques which typically includes structured, semi-structured or stimulated recall interviews, observations, and reflective journals. Data from these sources are triangulated, usually resulting in a general profile of a teacher's PCK.…”
Section: Pedagogical Content Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Shulman (1986), teachers develop a body of teaching knowledge about the content, which Shulman termed "pedagogical content knowledge," which is specific to each subject, is elaborated personally in the course of their teaching practice, distinguishes teaching as a profession, and is a form of reasoning and pedagogical action by means of which they transform the content of the subject into representations that are comprehensible to their students. In novice teachers, pedagogical content knowledge develops gradually through teaching experience (Mulholland & Wallace, 2005). Indeed, its depth and scope could well serve as a major indicator of a science teacher's development from beginner to expert (Clermont, Borko, & Krajcik, 1994).…”
Section: Educational Change In Science Teachers' Conceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%