Professional Development for Primary Teachers in Science and Technology 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6091-713-4_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Science and Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite general agreement on this umbrella definition of attitudes, several theoretical views exist on its conceptualization (e.g., Bohner and Dickel 2011;Eagly and Chaiken 2007;Van Aalderen-Smeets et al 2012). The framework for teachers' attitudes towards science formed the theoretical basis for our questionnaire development (Asma et al 2011;Van Aalderen-Smeets et al 2012). This framework revises the tripartite model of attitude, based on a literature review, focus group, and the theory of planned behavior (TPB).…”
Section: Attitudes Towards Ssimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite general agreement on this umbrella definition of attitudes, several theoretical views exist on its conceptualization (e.g., Bohner and Dickel 2011;Eagly and Chaiken 2007;Van Aalderen-Smeets et al 2012). The framework for teachers' attitudes towards science formed the theoretical basis for our questionnaire development (Asma et al 2011;Van Aalderen-Smeets et al 2012). This framework revises the tripartite model of attitude, based on a literature review, focus group, and the theory of planned behavior (TPB).…”
Section: Attitudes Towards Ssimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with the tripartite model, attitudes towards the behavior, as described in the TPB, can be distinguished in affective (e.g., pleasant-unpleasant) and evaluative (e.g., harmful-beneficial) beliefs about the outcomes associated with the behavior (Ajzen 1991(Ajzen , 2011Ajzen and Driver 1991). Following the framework for teachers' attitudes towards science and the TPB, perceived control should be distinguished into beliefs about dependency on context factors (i.e., perceived controllability) and beliefs or feelings about self-efficacy (Ajzen 2002;Asma et al 2011).…”
Section: Attitudes Towards Ssimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Personal attitude focuses on an individual's attitude toward science, whereas professional attitude focuses more on attitude toward the teaching of science. While recognizing that a person's professional attitude toward teaching science may be influenced by their personal attitude and vice versa (Asma, Walma van der Molen, & van Aalderen-Smeets, 2011), the current study emphasizes professional attitude, given that the research focused on attitudes toward teaching science.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the framework there is a clear distinction made between self-efficacy and context factors. A teacher might have high self-efficacy and have high context dependency, that is, a teacher perceives they need particular resources and materials in order to teach science (Asma et al, 2011;van Aalderen-Smeets et al, 2012). Other possibilities could include a teacher with low self-efficacy and high context dependency or a teacher with high self-efficacy and a low context dependency (van Aalderen-Smeets et al 2012).…”
Section: An Outline Of the Multi-dimensional Framework Used In The Cumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been empirically and theoretically verified through a variety of contexts and fields (Thibaut et al, 2018;Suprapto &Mursid, 2017;Asma et al, 2011). Additionally, a wide number of researchers concerned with technology education referred to the model under discussion to examine the professional attitudes of teachers toward technology (Asma et al 2011). Therefore, the theoretical framework provided by van Aalderen-Smeets et al ( 2012) was used to examine students' attitudes toward technology.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 95%