1969
DOI: 10.3109/17453676908989524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary Repair without Immobilization of Flexor Tendon Division within the Digital Sheath: An Experimental and Clinical Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0
5

Year Published

1975
1975
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
72
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…[5][6][7][8][9]. A possible mechanism for this adhesion resistance lies in the honeycomb microstructure with nanometer-scaled pores of the MPC hydrogel; these are assumed to block passage of extrinsic fibroblastic cells (more than 8-10 mm in diameter) for the peritendinous adhesions but allow passage of cytokines and growth factors for the tendon healing [23,24] (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[5][6][7][8][9]. A possible mechanism for this adhesion resistance lies in the honeycomb microstructure with nanometer-scaled pores of the MPC hydrogel; these are assumed to block passage of extrinsic fibroblastic cells (more than 8-10 mm in diameter) for the peritendinous adhesions but allow passage of cytokines and growth factors for the tendon healing [23,24] (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Now, however, it is well known that tendon healing can, and ideally should, occur in the absence of peritendinous adhesions and through the intrinsic process: by the activity of tenocytes in the tendon sheath with sufficient supplies of cytokines and growth factors from the outside [5,6]. Despite advances in surgical techniques and rehabilitation programs [7,8], the results of tendon repair within the sheath remain largely unpredictable [1,2]. Hence, many modalities have been investigated to prevent adhesion formation such as the use of pharmacologic modulators or mechanical barriers between the tendon and surrounding tissues [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The sheath was incised at the proximal interphalangeal (IP) joint and the flexor superficialis decussation. The lacerated tendons were repaired in the manner described by Kessler & Nissim (1969) with 4-0 braided dacron suture under 3.5 times magnification. A continuous 6-0 nylon epitenon suture was inserted to invaginate free tendon ends (Figure 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, both Savage (23) and Lee (16) described new suture methods designed to withstand early active mobilization. Savage showed that a six-strand method had an average ultimate load of 84 N, compared with the conventional two-strand method which withstood only 23 N. Using human tendons, Lee found that his suture method yielded an average ultimate load of 43 N, compared with 22 N for the more conventional Kessler method (12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%