2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prevention of peritendinous adhesions by a phospholipid polymer hydrogel formed in situ by spontaneous intermolecular interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(68 reference statements)
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A macroscopic adhesion grading system was implemented to estimate the severity of adhesion around the repaired tendon by two surgeons who were blinded to the groups. The grading system includes: grade 1, no marked adhesion; grade 2, filmy adhesion that could be readily separated using blunt dissection; grade 3, mild adhesion (>97.5% of the adhesion area could be separated using sharp dissection); grade 4, moderate adhesion (51%-97.5% of the adhesion area could be separated using sharp dissection); grade 5, severe adhesion (≤50% of the adhesion area could be separated using sharp dissection) [25,26].…”
Section: Gross Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A macroscopic adhesion grading system was implemented to estimate the severity of adhesion around the repaired tendon by two surgeons who were blinded to the groups. The grading system includes: grade 1, no marked adhesion; grade 2, filmy adhesion that could be readily separated using blunt dissection; grade 3, mild adhesion (>97.5% of the adhesion area could be separated using sharp dissection); grade 4, moderate adhesion (51%-97.5% of the adhesion area could be separated using sharp dissection); grade 5, severe adhesion (≤50% of the adhesion area could be separated using sharp dissection) [25,26].…”
Section: Gross Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The severity of peritendinous adhesion was evaluated by an adhesion scoring system 19 that was used to grade a particular area based on the surgical findings: grade 1, no adhesion; grade 2, adhesion area can be separated by blunt dissection alone; grade 3, adhesion area #50% which requires sharp dissection for separation; grade 4, adhesion area of 51%-97.5% which requires sharp dissection for separation; and grade 5, adhesion area of .97.5% requiring sharp dissection for separation. This was performed subjectively by an investigator skilled in performing surgery but blinded to the treatment groups to eliminate any bias.…”
Section: Macroscopic Evaluation and Peritendinous Adhesion Scoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An adhesion scoring system according to previous studies 8,25 was used based on the surgical findings as follows: grade 1, no adhesion; grade 2, adhesion area can be separated by blunt dissection alone; grade 3, adhesion area less than or equal to 50% and required sharp dissection for separation; grade 4, 51-97.5% adhesion area that required sharp dissection for separation; and grade 5, more than 97.5% of the adhesion area that required sharp dissection for separation. The measurements were carried out by two investigators who were blinded to the experimental grouping.…”
Section: Adhesion Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UTMD-mediated gene delivery has the advantages of high transfection efficiency, low immunogenicity and toxicity, repeatability and spatial target specificity. 3,8 In term of studies of UTMD involved with the tendon, Qiu et al 3 reported that the most favourable ultrasound conditions for the tendon consisted of an ultrasound pulse with 2 W cm −2 of output intensity and a 20% duty cycle for 10 min with local injection of microbubbles agent. The purpose of this study was to determine whether using UTMD to transfect wounded Achilles tendon with IGF-1 cDNA in rats would enhance regeneration of the tendon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%