2016
DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2016.46.4.254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary implant stability in a bone model simulating clinical situations for the posterior maxilla: an in vitro study

Abstract: PurposeThe aim of this study was to determine the influence of anatomical conditions on primary stability in the models simulating posterior maxilla.MethodsPolyurethane blocks were designed to simulate monocortical (M) and bicortical (B) conditions. Each condition had four subgroups measuring 3 mm (M3, B3), 5 mm (M5, B5), 8 mm (M8, B8), and 12 mm (M12, B12) in residual bone height (RBH). After implant placement, the implant stability quotient (ISQ), Periotest value (PTV), insertion torque (IT), and reverse tor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intentional sinus penetration by implants was reported by Brånemark as early as 1984. Animal and in vitro studies that conducted insertion/removal torque or resonance frequency analysis observed increased implant stability with bicortical anchorage compared to unicortical fixation. Conversely, Hsu et al reported that primary stability of implants with bicortical fixation did not significantly differ from that of implants with unicortical anchorage under clinical conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intentional sinus penetration by implants was reported by Brånemark as early as 1984. Animal and in vitro studies that conducted insertion/removal torque or resonance frequency analysis observed increased implant stability with bicortical anchorage compared to unicortical fixation. Conversely, Hsu et al reported that primary stability of implants with bicortical fixation did not significantly differ from that of implants with unicortical anchorage under clinical conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implant primary stability is a key factor in achieving osseointegration and is one of the prerequisites for successful immediate/early loading procedures. 1 Primary stability is affected by multiple factors such as bone quality, 2 bone density, 3 bone morphology, 4 implant design, 5 implant surface roughness, 6 preparation of the implant site, [5][6][7][8] crestal bone anchorage, 9 apical anchorage through the cortical floor of the sinus or nasal cavities, 10 lateral cortical anchorage, 11 and implant dimensions. 2,12,13 Optimal implant stability is more difficult to achieve in lowdensity bone, such as that of the posterior maxilla.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The insertion torque is the maximum torque needed to insert the implant in the placement site. This value may reflect average properties of the bone into which the implant is inserted (eg, average bone density), but it is also sensitive to local factors such as the presence of a cortical layer stabilizing the implant apically and/or coronally . The integral (I) instead measures the total energy exchanged between the implant and the surrounding bone during implant placement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, No 1, 2017, pp. [18][19][20][21][22] Medical University of Varna ysis (18). According to their results the primary stability is influenced by the existence of cortical bone.…”
Section: Influence Of the Cortical Bone Thickness On The Primary Stabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to their results the primary stability is influenced by the existence of cortical bone. Han et al (19) inserted implants in artificial monocortical and bicortical bone blocks and found that the bicortical conditions could improve the primary stability.…”
Section: Influence Of the Cortical Bone Thickness On The Primary Stabmentioning
confidence: 99%