2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2010.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary epithelioid trophoblastic tumor with a synchronous breast carcinoma detected only with FDG-PET/CT Scan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four cases among five previous reports exhibited cystic components within lesions on radiological images . The ETT in our case did not show cystic components within the lesion on CT and MR images.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Four cases among five previous reports exhibited cystic components within lesions on radiological images . The ETT in our case did not show cystic components within the lesion on CT and MR images.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…6,7 In the remaining article, tumor detection on T2WIs was difficult. 9 The tumor did not show hypointensity on T2WIs compared to the normal uterine myometrium in any of previous cases. Histologically, ETT contains dense hyalinization and eosinophilic necrotic debris, consistent with the findings in our case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kara et al have reported a case of uterine ETT diagnosed by fractional curettage, it was difficult to detect tumor as its intensity was similar to that of a normal endometrium. 5 Last case was well-circumscribed tumor containing hypoenhanced area reported by Okumura et al, and it was diagnosed ETT with necrotic cell debris. 7 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…ETT is a rare disease, so few studies have reported on the radiographic findings seen in uterine ETT. Although there is no previous report focused on CT or MRI findings, and only PET-CT findings has been reported, 5 there are three clinical or pathological reports that contained MR images. 5 7 This report aimed to identify some keys to the presurgical differential diagnosis of ETT, namely, CT or MRI findings that would be incompatible with a diagnosis of uterine carcinoma, referring to pathological findings and MR images of previous reports.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%