2002
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa012015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary Chemoprevention of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis with Sulindac

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
205
0
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 365 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
205
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Observations that the selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib, as well as other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as sulindac, induce regression of existing adenomas, as well as prevent polyposis in FAP patients (Giardiello et al, 1993(Giardiello et al, , 2002Steinbach et al, 2000) and murine models of FAP (Jacoby et al, 2000), concurs with our finding that the intestinal epithelial cell phenotype induced by macrophages in our model, was reversible. If an initiation-promotion-progression paradigm is applied to human colorectal carcinogenesis (Pitot et al, 2000), reversibility in vitro implies a role for COX-2 during reversible tumour promotion and emphasises the importance of COX-2 as a chemoprevention target for a potentially reversible stage of colorectal carcinogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Observations that the selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib, as well as other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as sulindac, induce regression of existing adenomas, as well as prevent polyposis in FAP patients (Giardiello et al, 1993(Giardiello et al, , 2002Steinbach et al, 2000) and murine models of FAP (Jacoby et al, 2000), concurs with our finding that the intestinal epithelial cell phenotype induced by macrophages in our model, was reversible. If an initiation-promotion-progression paradigm is applied to human colorectal carcinogenesis (Pitot et al, 2000), reversibility in vitro implies a role for COX-2 during reversible tumour promotion and emphasises the importance of COX-2 as a chemoprevention target for a potentially reversible stage of colorectal carcinogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…34 The incidence of any adverse event did not differ significantly between the sulindac and placebo group. Sulindac had no effect on adenoma development or characteristics.…”
Section: Efficacymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In contrast, COX-2 knock-out mice are more resistant to tumorigenesis in various organs (Oshima et al, 1996;Tiano et al, 2002;Howe et al, 2005). A number of clinical studies were performed for colorectal cancer prevention by administration of Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or COX-2 inhibitors including sulindac, aspirin, celecoxib, rofecoxib (Giardiello et al, 1996;Steinbach et al, 2000;Giardiello et al, 2002;Baron et al, 2003;Higuchi et al, 2003;Sandler et al, 2003;Bertagnolli et al, 2006). These COX-2 inhibitors reduced adenoma only at a high dose but significantly increased mortality from cardiovascular complication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%