2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-99641-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PRIMA: a rapid and cost-effective genotyping method to detect single-nucleotide differences using probe-induced heteroduplexes

Abstract: Targeted mutagenesis by programmable site-specific nucleases like CRISPR typically produce 1-base pair (bp) insertion or deletion (indel) mutations. Although several methods have been developed to detect such 1-bp indels, each method has pros and cons in terms of cost and/or resolution. Heteroduplex mobility assay (HMA) is a traditional technique detecting small base pair differences but it has a limited resolution of mutation size and the band patterns are often complex. Here, we developed a new method called… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The frameshift of rdp1-3 and rdp1-6 were identical. These frameshift mutants were genotyped by PRIMA using primers (Forward primer, 5′–TAGGCACAATGGAAAGTTAG–3′; Reverse primer, 5′–TT AACATAAAAGAACCATTGTAAG–3′) and 40-mer probe (5′–GGAGACTTTGTAGATACCAGAGTTCATCTTCTGCAGAAC G–3′) as described previously ( Kakui et al, 2021 ). T-DNA fragments containing CRISPR/Cas9 and GFP marker were removed from each strain of rdp1-3 and rdp1-6 by selecting non-fluorescence seeds ( Tsutsui and Higashiyama, 2017 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frameshift of rdp1-3 and rdp1-6 were identical. These frameshift mutants were genotyped by PRIMA using primers (Forward primer, 5′–TAGGCACAATGGAAAGTTAG–3′; Reverse primer, 5′–TT AACATAAAAGAACCATTGTAAG–3′) and 40-mer probe (5′–GGAGACTTTGTAGATACCAGAGTTCATCTTCTGCAGAAC G–3′) as described previously ( Kakui et al, 2021 ). T-DNA fragments containing CRISPR/Cas9 and GFP marker were removed from each strain of rdp1-3 and rdp1-6 by selecting non-fluorescence seeds ( Tsutsui and Higashiyama, 2017 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heteroduplex Mobility Assay (HMA) can also distinguish between the heteroduplexes and homoduplexes DNA in native PAGE but indels smaller than 3 bp in size can be missed 11 , 12 . Improved versions of the HMA called improved heteroduplex analysis (iHDA) 13 and Probe-Induced HMA (PRIMA) 14 use DNA probes to detect 1-bp pair indels after gene editing. Though these techniques can detect a wide range of indels, they does involve multiple steps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, probes can be purchased to save time but the fee for a 200-nucleotide oligo is relatively expensive. PRIMA solves this problem by making use of shorter probes; however, it requires additional PCR step before hybridization with the probes 14 . With additional PCR step, there will also be the need of pre-testing of PCR products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Heteroduplex Mobility Assay (HMA) can also distinguish between the heteroduplexes and homoduplexes DNA in native PAGE [11,12]. Moreover, improved versions of the HMA called improved heteroduplex analysis (iHDA) [13] and Probe-Induced HMA (PRIMA) [14] use DNA probes to detect 1-bp pair insertions after gene editing. A weak point of these methods is that they require special equipment and might need skilled techniques for optimizations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%