2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2007.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Priest or Jester? Jacob L. Talmon (1916–1980) on history and intellectual engagement

Abstract: This essay provides a general introduction to the special number on Jacob L. Talmon . The essay sketches the outlines of Talmon's intellectual biography, beginning with his study of the origins of totalitarian democracy, moving through his analysis of nationalism and political messianism, and ending with his study of the ideological clash of the 20th century. The essay raises the question of whether Talmon should be seen as a thinker wishing to defend existing traditions (i.e. a ''priest''), or as a radical an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Berlin and others were liberals similarly influenced in their thinking by the Holocaust – perhaps the 20th century’s most horrific reminder of the terrors of ideology. ‘Talmon was well aware of the fact that his heroes’, argues Arie Dubnov (2008b: 134), ‘instead of being protectors of human dignity and individual liberty, can provide sophisticated justifications and cruel rationalisations for oppression and autocracy’. While Talmon was not the only theorist belonging to this tradition of a ‘liberalism of fear’ (Shklar, 1998) or a pessimistic liberalism, his work provides a look into a notable attempt at tracing the history of a crusading, optimistic, liberalism – and critiquing its failures, horrors, and legacies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berlin and others were liberals similarly influenced in their thinking by the Holocaust – perhaps the 20th century’s most horrific reminder of the terrors of ideology. ‘Talmon was well aware of the fact that his heroes’, argues Arie Dubnov (2008b: 134), ‘instead of being protectors of human dignity and individual liberty, can provide sophisticated justifications and cruel rationalisations for oppression and autocracy’. While Talmon was not the only theorist belonging to this tradition of a ‘liberalism of fear’ (Shklar, 1998) or a pessimistic liberalism, his work provides a look into a notable attempt at tracing the history of a crusading, optimistic, liberalism – and critiquing its failures, horrors, and legacies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%