A pessimistic liberalism: Jacob Talmon’s suspicion and the birth of contemporary political thought

Abstract

Discussions of liberalism as a political ideology often focus on the progressive, civilisational, and triumphalist ideologies of liberal thinkers. Scholarly work on liberal empire situates these issues in the context of colonialism, and contemporary discussions of liberal world order devote much intellectual space to optimism about liberalism. Scholars have spent much less time connecting liberalism to deep cynicism and suspicion. This article, in focusing on what I term a ‘pessimistic liberalism’, fills this gap by examining the ways that the spectre of totalitarianism influenced post-war liberal thought. The mid-20th century was a pivotal moment where both liberalism and its critics proceeded to make arguments about politics that began from similar attitudes about the nature of the political: suspicion, cynicism, resignation, and fear. Specifically, the article analyses historian Jacob Talmon’s genealogy of modern leftist thought to illustrate the shift in liberal thinking from its 19th century optimism to its 20th century pessimism and scepticism. Talmon’s engagement with the issues of political messianism, nationalism, and cosmopolitanism represented a ‘hermeneutics of suspicion’ ( pace Paul Ricoeur) that critiqued the triumphalism of previous political projects. The article concludes by connecting this project to the broader development of ‘contemporary political thought’ and reflects on pessimism’s place in politics.

Emotion Regulation and Dynamics of Moral Concerns During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic

“…On the other hand, we find that liberals were more sad and pessimistic, but also had higher anticipation and higher bias of fairness than conservatives. Previous work has related liberal thinking to more suspicion, pessimism and cynicism from a political science perspective (Tatum 2019), andGraham et al (2009) showed that liberals have greater endorsement and use of the fairness foundations.…”