2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/3268130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pricing Problem in the E-Commerce Low-Carbon Supply Chain under Asymmetric Fairness Preferences

Abstract: Given the different fairness preferences of online retailers and their investment in emission reduction and revenue sharing with manufacturers, an e-commerce low-carbon supply chain decision model was established using Stackelberg game theory under three circumstances: no fairness preference, symmetric fairness preferences, and asymmetric fairness preferences. Results reveal that the asymmetric fairness preference behaviors of online retailers weaken the manufacturers’ profits, where the online retailer’s util… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Huang et al (2022) illustrated that when the e-platform hides real information about fairness concerns, both the return rate and profit of all CLSC members are reduced. Song et al (2022) studied the profit distribution problem in low-carbon E-CLSC, and they proved that online retailers' fairness concerns would increase their own utility but reduce the manufacturer's profit. Han et al (2020) comprehensively considered the impact of government allowances and fairness on low-carbon E-CLSC and proposed a cost-sharing contract to coordinate the supply chain.…”
Section: Coordination Under Fairness Concerns In E-clscmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Huang et al (2022) illustrated that when the e-platform hides real information about fairness concerns, both the return rate and profit of all CLSC members are reduced. Song et al (2022) studied the profit distribution problem in low-carbon E-CLSC, and they proved that online retailers' fairness concerns would increase their own utility but reduce the manufacturer's profit. Han et al (2020) comprehensively considered the impact of government allowances and fairness on low-carbon E-CLSC and proposed a cost-sharing contract to coordinate the supply chain.…”
Section: Coordination Under Fairness Concerns In E-clscmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enzo et al [10] analyzed the logistics performance and carbon dioxide emissions of countries around the world and put forward the concept of low-carbon logistics model. Song et al [11] analyzed how to achieve the corresponding emission reduction target under the condition of limited total cost input and established the e-commerce low-carbon supply chain decision-making model under three conditions. Li et al [12] proposed the establish-ment of a mathematical model based on the cost of low-carbon logistics to achieve the best low-carbon vehicle route.…”
Section: Literature Review 121 the Application Of Low Carbon Target M...mentioning
confidence: 99%