1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6297(199607/08)12:4<363::aid-agr6>3.0.co;2-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Price information in Producer markets: An evaluation of futures and spot cotton price relationships in the southwest region using cointegration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Information on how well the price discovery function is performed by commodity futures markets is essential, because these markets are widely used by firms, engaged in the production, marketing, and processing of commodities, to shift risk, facilitate equity financing, and discover prices (see, e.g. Hudson et al, 1996;Yang and Leatham, 1999;Pennings and Leuthold, 2000). In addition to focusing on the long-run causal relationship (as defined by Bruneau and Jondeau (1999)) between the futures price and the spot price as a usual way to examine the price discovery function of futures markets, we show that the notion of full adjustment, as used in our test procedure, provides a completely new perspective and insight for exploring the price discovery function of futures markets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information on how well the price discovery function is performed by commodity futures markets is essential, because these markets are widely used by firms, engaged in the production, marketing, and processing of commodities, to shift risk, facilitate equity financing, and discover prices (see, e.g. Hudson et al, 1996;Yang and Leatham, 1999;Pennings and Leuthold, 2000). In addition to focusing on the long-run causal relationship (as defined by Bruneau and Jondeau (1999)) between the futures price and the spot price as a usual way to examine the price discovery function of futures markets, we show that the notion of full adjustment, as used in our test procedure, provides a completely new perspective and insight for exploring the price discovery function of futures markets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dividing the GARCH model into four different versions such as bivariate GARCH, bivariate BEKK GARCH, bivariate GARCH-X, and bivariate BEKK GARCH-X, Choudhry (2009) compares the hedging effect of stockpiled goods against non-stockpiled goods based on futures prices and spot prices of seven agricultural products, includ-ing maize, coffee, wheat, sugar, soy, livestock, and live pigs. The results reveal the outstanding performance of the through estimated hedge ratios calculated by the GARCH-X model in all stages, supporting Hudson et al (1996) and Yang et al (2001). However, different from Yang and Awokuse's (2003) research results, Choudhry (2009) points out that hedging effectiveness between stockpiled and non-stockpiled goods is quite similar.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In terms of the research methodology, it can be seen that previous researches find the correlation between futures prices and spot prices by separately applying different kinds of cointegration, including VECM, VAR, GARCH, or mostly combined methods. Hudson et al (1996) collect 81 observations per year for 4 consecutive years and then apply Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) to show that cotton spot prices and futures prices are not correlated, which means that futures market and spot market experience a weak relationship. Using the same approach, Arfaoui (2018) justifies the longterm equilibrium relationship between crude oil spot prices and futures prices on the NYCE from 2007 to 2015.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications of non-stationarity and cointegration methods have also been undertaken to study dynamic agricultural price relationships and market integration. For instanee, Hudson et al, (1996) reports an evaluation of future and spot cotton price relationships in the Southwest region of the US using cointegration methods. The econometric procedures in this paper used a variant of the Granger causality test based on the traditional single equation approach of estimating restricted and unrestricted equations but applied to an error-correction model of the Engle-Granger-type.…”
Section: Review Of Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%