2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.finmar.2016.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Price discovery and the cross-section of high-frequency trading

Abstract: We quantify the price discovery contribution of high-frequency traders (HFTs) in the United Kingdom equity market and examine how it varies in their cross-section. For this, we group individual HFTs according to their liquidity taking/making activity. HFTs contribute about 14% of all trade-induced information, with aggressive HFTs accounting for two-thirds of this contribution. This suggests that HFTs who pursue strategies that require use of aggressive trades are the most informed, as opposed to passive HFTs … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
31
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hagströmer & Nordén (2013) document strong persistence in types, with about half a dozen HFM types and two dozen HFB types. Benos & Sagade (2016) find the same and further report that both types seem to be informed. Brogaard, Hendershott & Riordan (2014) carefully distinguish between transitory and permanent price changes and find that HFT market orders trade in the direction of permanent price changes, and HFM limit orders opposite to them.…”
Section: Evidencesupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Hagströmer & Nordén (2013) document strong persistence in types, with about half a dozen HFM types and two dozen HFB types. Benos & Sagade (2016) find the same and further report that both types seem to be informed. Brogaard, Hendershott & Riordan (2014) carefully distinguish between transitory and permanent price changes and find that HFT market orders trade in the direction of permanent price changes, and HFM limit orders opposite to them.…”
Section: Evidencesupporting
confidence: 59%
“…These criteria are also consistent with other schemes used to identify HFTs, such as those in Baron, Brogaard, and Kirilenko (2014), Kirilenko, Kyle, Samadi, and Tuzun (2016), and Korajczyk and Murphy (2016). The resulting data set of HFT activity is very similar to that used by Benos and Sagade (2016).We also use reports on proprietary trades submitted by the 10 largest investment banks (IBs) to compare and contrast the trading activity of the IBs with that of HFTs.8 For the remainder of the paper, we refer to both HFTs and IBs as (trading) firms.Finally, we use quote data from the LSE, obtained via Bloomberg, to reconstruct the top of the order book and to match the ZEN trade reports with the prevailing best bid and ask prices at the time of a given transaction. This allows us to classify trades as either buyer-or seller-initiated, using the usual classification scheme of Lee and Ready (1991).…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Most previous studies have been restricted to using aggregate measures of HFT or AT participation and have focused more on the speed aspects of computer-based trading, and less on the "cross-sectional" aspects. 5 A concurrent study by Boehmer, Li, and Saar (2016) 5 Benos and Sagade (2016), Hagströmer and Nordén (2013), and Hagströmer, Nordén, and Zhang (2014) also make explicit use of the ability to follow individual HFT firms. Their focus is, however, quite different from ours, and mostly on classifying and distinguishing HFTs along market-maker and market-taker lines and assessing the aggregate impact of HFTs on market quality.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hasbrouck and Saar, 2013), or message traffic (e.g. Hendershott, Jones and Menkveld, 2011 Benos and Sagade, 2016;). Note that most of these data sets only cover short sample periods (several months at most).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%