2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Price and purity analysis for illicit drug: Data and conceptual issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
79
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
79
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While a full legalization counterfactual requires many additional assumptions-for example, on the destruction rate δ , the efficiency of the matching process and the entry costs K B and K S -our analysis illustrates that the dispersion of quality of drugs will decrease and the average quality of drugs will increase if buyers gain better information. The reduction in quality dispersion may bring health benefits: Caulkins (2007) argues that greater variability in purity predicts overdoses because users inadvertently consume more pure drug than they intend to when they purchase drugs that are more pure than is typical; at the same time, the increase in average quality may increase aggregate consumption and, thus, may bring health costs. However, the results in Table 4 suggest that this aggregate increase will not be large, curbing these additional costs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a full legalization counterfactual requires many additional assumptions-for example, on the destruction rate δ , the efficiency of the matching process and the entry costs K B and K S -our analysis illustrates that the dispersion of quality of drugs will decrease and the average quality of drugs will increase if buyers gain better information. The reduction in quality dispersion may bring health benefits: Caulkins (2007) argues that greater variability in purity predicts overdoses because users inadvertently consume more pure drug than they intend to when they purchase drugs that are more pure than is typical; at the same time, the increase in average quality may increase aggregate consumption and, thus, may bring health costs. However, the results in Table 4 suggest that this aggregate increase will not be large, curbing these additional costs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was demonstrated by the "Expected Purity Hypothesis" developed by Caulkins (1994), which states that a key factor that influences drug prices are consumers' perceptions of the drug's potency. Given that drugs are "experience goods" purchasers are often unable to assess their quality until after consumption Caulkins, 2007). Additionally, even after consumption it is difficult for the user to estimate the drugs purity, as some cutting agents have psychoactive effects distorting their perception of the drugs quality .…”
Section: Economic Analysis: Price Determinantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chapter 5 used data on police arrests for drug possession as an indirect measure of variations in drug availability in the community. Some have argued that arrest data of this type is not a valid measure of drug supply because changes in political focus or policing activity may also lead to an increase in arrests independent of changes in drug availability (Caulkins, 2007;Rosenfeld and Decker, 1999). However, there are also limitations to other potential indicators.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular price data may be a less sensitive measure of availability, because in variations in supply drug suppliers will typically modify drug purity (e.g. "cutting" drugs with other substances) in order to maintain standardised sale amounts and prices (Caulkins, 2007).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation