2012
DOI: 10.1139/z11-117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prey competition between sympatric Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) and northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) on Lovushki Island, Russia

Abstract: Approximately 1 000 Steller sea lions ( Eumetopias jubatus (Schreber, 1776); SSL) and 14 000 northern fur seals ( Callorhinus ursinus (L., 1758); NFS) breed sympatrically on Lovushki Island in the Russian Far East, creating the potential for interspecific competition for prey. An additional 13 000 – 14 000 juvenile NFS are present during the breeding season. The diets of breeding SSL and both breeding and juvenile NFS were examined through analysis of scats and spews collected during the breeding seasons of 20… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
4
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Most prominently, females dove deeper during periods of high nighttime moonlight. Similar to reports at other portions of the species' range, vertically migrating prey species appear to make up a substantial portion of female northern fur seal diet on Lovushki (Waite et al 2012). Therefore, the simplest explanation for this effect was that females were tracking changes in the distribution of their prey (Croxall et al 1985, Horning & Trillmich 1999, Ream et al 2005, Lea et al 2010.…”
Section: Moonlight Effectssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Most prominently, females dove deeper during periods of high nighttime moonlight. Similar to reports at other portions of the species' range, vertically migrating prey species appear to make up a substantial portion of female northern fur seal diet on Lovushki (Waite et al 2012). Therefore, the simplest explanation for this effect was that females were tracking changes in the distribution of their prey (Croxall et al 1985, Horning & Trillmich 1999, Ream et al 2005, Lea et al 2010.…”
Section: Moonlight Effectssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…), pollock (Theragra chalcogramma), and Atka mackerel (Pleurogrammus monopterygius), with Pacific herring (Clupea pallasii) and northern smoothtongue (Leuroglossus schmidti) within the top 3 prey items on some islands (Table 4). Considerable variability existed among the islands, with Atka mackerel predominating on Lovushki (Waite 2010;Waite and Burkanov 2006) and, with a smaller margin, on Brat Chirpoev. Pollock was the main prey item by a wide margin on Yamsky.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blokhin at Kamchatka Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography identified prey species to the lowest possible taxonomic group. Finally, for each prey type, we calculated the frequency of occurrence as FO = (N i /N t ) 9 100, where N i is the number of samples containing prey type i and N t is the total number of samples (Waite et al 2012).…”
Section: Diet Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%