2012
DOI: 10.3354/meps10038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of environment, morphology, and instrument size on lactating northern fur seal Callorhinus ursinus foraging behavior on the Lovushki Islands, Russia

Abstract: Food limitation may be one of the causes of declines in northern fur seal populations on the Pribilof Islands. This hypothesis could be tested by comparing foraging behavior from decreasing Pribilof fur seal populations and an increasing population, such as on the Lovushki Islands, Russia, but factors other than prey availability that differ between sites may also influence behavior. Therefore, we evaluated such factors, including lunar cycle, weather, seal body size, and size of recording instruments, by stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, once animals reach a large enough size that they are able to efficiently exploit these depths, the benefits of additional aerobic stores may be minimal. A similar response has been found in adult female northern fur seals Callorhinus ursinus, whose body size does not appear to be a driving factor in the duration of dives (Skinner et al 2012).…”
Section: Effects Of Individual Differences On Foraging Behavioursupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Thus, once animals reach a large enough size that they are able to efficiently exploit these depths, the benefits of additional aerobic stores may be minimal. A similar response has been found in adult female northern fur seals Callorhinus ursinus, whose body size does not appear to be a driving factor in the duration of dives (Skinner et al 2012).…”
Section: Effects Of Individual Differences On Foraging Behavioursupporting
confidence: 74%
“…2), we included the frontal surface area (FSA) of the tag(s) as a covariate. While FSA may not be the best representation of the drag an animal experiences (Kay et al , 2019; Kyte et al , 2019), it has been used previously for this species (Skinner et al , 2012) and was the best metric we could reliably calculate given the dataset and the free-ranging nature of seals in our study. We calculated the total FSA (sum across all tags) and the effective FSA (the FSA of the anterior tag and any excess area by the second tag) to account for the fact that TDRs were placed directly behind the often larger satellite tag.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Georges et al , (2000b) ; 5. average of pelagic divers: Kuhn (2011) ; 6. Skinner et al. , (2012) ; 7.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%