2015
DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2015.1032983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preventive and corrective maintenance – cost comparison and cost–benefit analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually, an average ratio of PM cost to CM cost for electrical and mechanical systems is around 0.35 [50]. As the PM cost for fabric components is lower than that for MEP systems due to the complexity of the latter, an average value of 0.25 (mean of the lowest and the highest ratios), which is smaller than the average ratio of MEP maintenance, then is assumed to be a general ratio of PM cost to CM cost for building fabric maintenance in this study [51]. Therefore, the PM cost for fabric components can be determined by: 0.25 × Corrective maintenance cost = Preventive maintenance cost…”
Section: Fig2 Methodology Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Usually, an average ratio of PM cost to CM cost for electrical and mechanical systems is around 0.35 [50]. As the PM cost for fabric components is lower than that for MEP systems due to the complexity of the latter, an average value of 0.25 (mean of the lowest and the highest ratios), which is smaller than the average ratio of MEP maintenance, then is assumed to be a general ratio of PM cost to CM cost for building fabric maintenance in this study [51]. Therefore, the PM cost for fabric components can be determined by: 0.25 × Corrective maintenance cost = Preventive maintenance cost…”
Section: Fig2 Methodology Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the inspection cost (IC) usually accounts for 80% of the PM cost according to empirical assessment [51]. Therefore the inspection cost of building fabric components can be assumed as follows: 0.8 × Preventive maintenance cost = Inspection cost (8) In order to intuitively validate the feasibility of the schedule and cost planning which is obtained from the management panel based on this workflow design, sensitivity analysis is an appropriate method to achieve this purpose by linking the building fabric maintenance with its sensitive uncertainties such as the limitations of budget, the fluctuations of material prices, the availability of skilled labors and equipment, etc.…”
Section: Fig2 Methodology Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Maintenance can represent a significant portion of the cost in asset intensive organizations, as breakdowns have an impact on the capacity, quality and cost of operation [21]. However, the formulation of a maintenance strategy depends on a number of factors, including the cost of down time, reliability characteristics and redundancy of assets.…”
Section: Science and Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%