2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-1987(03)00107-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention strategies for field traffic-induced subsoil compaction: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
119
0
23

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
119
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, GWC values were also similar for both layers, since the traffic was performed in the field capacity. Thus, the greater BD values at 5.5-10.5 cm depth can be ascribed to the dissipation of the stress applied by the harvester wheels to the soil surface with increasing depth, which is explained mathematically by the Boussinesq equation (ALAKUKKU et al, 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, GWC values were also similar for both layers, since the traffic was performed in the field capacity. Thus, the greater BD values at 5.5-10.5 cm depth can be ascribed to the dissipation of the stress applied by the harvester wheels to the soil surface with increasing depth, which is explained mathematically by the Boussinesq equation (ALAKUKKU et al, 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lamandé and SchjØnning (2011a) emphasized that the relative importance of axle load and tire configuration (size and inflation pressure) have been extensively debated in soil compaction research (e.g., Soane et al, 1981aSoane et al, , 1981bTijink et al, 1995;Bédard et al, 1997). Similarly, the relative benefits of tires and tracks, and their effects on soil compaction, have received considerable attention (e.g., Culshaw, 1986;Erbach, 1994;Alakukku et al, 2003;Pagliai et al, 2003;Godwin, 2007, 2008). This debate merits consideration given the trend toward the use of larger machinery indicated above (Lamandé and SchjØnning, 2011a), which has, to a large extent, offset the advances made by the industry in developing improved running gear such as tire and track designs to reduce contact pressures (Dresser et al, 2006;Chamen, 2011).…”
Section: Traffic-i Duced Soil Compactiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, machine trafficking causes soil compaction (Jamshidi et al 2008) and rutting, and is one of the major sources of humaninduced forest soil degradation (Gomez et al 2002, Bagheri et al 2013). The pressure exerted by loaded vehicles moving through the forest is a major factor causing compaction and rut formation (McNabb et al 2001, Alakukku et al 2003, Nugent et al 2003, Eliasson 2005. In the last decades, the weights of forestry machines have increased, thus raising new concern over forest soil degradation (Sheridan 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies concerning soil degradation due to forest operations have examined the physical parameters of soil, such as bulk density, total porosity, macro and micro porosity, shear and penetration resistances, and infiltration capacity (Alakukku et al 2003, Ampoorter et al 2007, Jourgholami et al 2014, Marchi et al 2014. The physical parameters of soil are usually determined by means of soil sample collection and analysis, or measured using specific instruments, such as penetrometers and scissometers (Picchio et al 2012, Venanzi et al 2016, or by means of manual measurements of cross-sectional and longitudinal profiles on skid trails (Koren et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%