2005
DOI: 10.1080/09687630500337162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention programmes for children of problem drinkers: A review

Abstract: It is well established that children of problem drinkers have an increased risk of developing mental health problems, including drinking and drug misuse problems, depression, eating disorders, conduct disorders, and delinquency. However, compared to the hundreds of studies that have examined the effects of parental problem drinking on their children, the genetics of problem drinking, and the physical and mental problems of these children, it is disappointing that so few studies have explored the possibilities … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
35
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Fortunately, prevention science has produced a number of effective substance use programs that are now listed on websites (NIDA, CSAP's NREPP, and UNODC). Comparative effectiveness reviews (Cuijpers 2003(Cuijpers , 2005Foxcroft et al 2003;Midford 2009;Miller and Hendrie 2008) have found that the most effective programs are family interventions that target high risk and disadvantaged groups using behavioural change techniques based on cognitive social learning theory. Also, the Strengthening Families Program 10-14 Years (Spoth and Redmond 1996;Spoth et al 2001) was found by the Cochrane Reviews at Oxford University to be twice as effective as any school-based substance abuse prevention program for teens (Foxcroft et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Fortunately, prevention science has produced a number of effective substance use programs that are now listed on websites (NIDA, CSAP's NREPP, and UNODC). Comparative effectiveness reviews (Cuijpers 2003(Cuijpers , 2005Foxcroft et al 2003;Midford 2009;Miller and Hendrie 2008) have found that the most effective programs are family interventions that target high risk and disadvantaged groups using behavioural change techniques based on cognitive social learning theory. Also, the Strengthening Families Program 10-14 Years (Spoth and Redmond 1996;Spoth et al 2001) was found by the Cochrane Reviews at Oxford University to be twice as effective as any school-based substance abuse prevention program for teens (Foxcroft et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…48 We can conclude that only little research has been conducted on the effectiveness of selective prevention for children of parents with problematic substance use. 49 Finally, students in special and lower education form a high-risk group for developing problematic substance use. 50 Several schoolbased prevention programs have been developed for this group.…”
Section: Selective and Indicated Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dazu gehören zentrale Schutzfaktoren der kindlichen Entwicklung wie der Kohärenz-sinn [23] [17] dern ist eine weitere Komponente. Bislang fehlt aber eine ausdrückliche Über-prüfung der Wirksamkeit dieser Maß-nahmen zur Resilienzförderung, das heißt, es gibt bislang kaum eine wissenschaftliche Evidenz dafür, dass diese Programme das hohe Risiko der Kinder aus suchtbelasteten Familien wirksam reduzieren [9,35,36].…”
Section: Schutzfaktorenunclassified