Effectiveness of a Culturally Adapted Strengthening Families Program 12–16 Years for High-Risk Irish Families

Kumpfer, Karol L.; Xie, Jing; O'Driscoll, Robert

doi:10.1007/s10566-011-9168-0

Cited by 46 publications

(52 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Smit et al, 2008;Kaminski, Valle, Filene & Boyle, 2008) indicated that these interventions have demonstrated efficacy in preventing substance use and other child problem behaviors. These positive results have been reported in different settings (Aalborg et al, 2010;Letarte, Normandeau & Allard, 2010;Redmond et al, 2009;Henggeler & Schoenwald, 2011;Brook, McDonald & Yan, 2012;Donavan, Wood, Frayjo, Black & Surette, 2012), target groups (Mindel & Hoefer, 2006;Orte, Touza, Ballester & March, 2008;McDaniel, Braiden, Onyekwelu, Murphy & Regan, 2011;Posthumus, Raaimakers, Maassen, Engeland, & Matthys, 2012;Kumpfer, Whiteside, Greene & Allen, 2010), cultures (Skärstrand, Larsson & Andréasson, 2008;Pérez, et al, 2009;Kumpfer, Xie & O'Driscoll, 2012;Brotman et al, 2009;Ortega, Giannotta, Latina & Ciairano, 2012) and addicted behaviours (Trudeau, Spoth, Randall & Azevedo, 2007;Zhong, et al, 2011;Donovan et al, 2012). …”

Section: Objeto Y Alcance De La Presente Revisión Bibliográficamentioning

confidence: 73%

Participación parental en intervenciones familiares para prevenir drogodependencias: una revisión empírica

Negreiros

2013

Ped Soc. Rev Int

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

participación parental en intervenciones familiares preventivas de toxicodependencias: una revisión bibliográfica empírica [ 39 ] sips -pedagogia social. revista interuniversitaria [1139-1723 (2013) Jorge NegreirosUniversidad de Oporto RESUMEN: El uso y el abuso de drogas son muy habituales en la adolescencia. Los padres desempeñan un importante papel en el consumo de drogas, tanto incitando a su consumo como fomentando la protección y la resiliencia. Las intervenciones familiares han demostrado ser un enfoque beneficioso en la prevención del consumo adolescente y otras conductas problemáticas de la adolescencia. No obstante, los bajos índices de participación representan una importante amenaza a la validez de las intervenciones familiares preventivas. Desde hace tiempo se viene reconociendo que uno de los principales problemas para la realización de intervenciones familiares es la captación, retención y participación de los progenitores. Aparte de esto, se ha visto que una mayor participación de los padres en las formaciones de prevención para progenitores está asociada a un efecto duradero sobre la conducta adolescente. Identificar específicamente lo que determina que la familia se implique y participe en los programas de prevención familiares es de máxima importancia, puesto que la implicación de los padres puede ser un factor de pronóstico de la eficacia del programa. Últi-mamente se ha prestado más atención a entender de qué manera los factores individuales, contextuales y de intervención pueden predecir la participación parental en las intervenciones familiares de prevención de drogodependencias. Los estudios sobre los factores de pronóstico de participación son útiles para identificar a aquellos individuos que hallan en mayor riesgo de abandonar. En este trabajo ofrecemos un repaso de la evolución más reciente de los diversos factores de pronóstico de la participación familiar en programas preventivos de consumo de drogas y otros problemas. A partir de los determinantes específicos y dinámicos de la participación que se estudian en este trabajo, al final proponemos un marco teórico de la participación familiar que presenta cuatro componentes básicos: (1) patrones de interacción familiar; (2) conocimiento y percepciones de los padres sobre los problemas conductuales de los hijos; (3) variables psicológicas de los hijos; y (4) percepciones de los padres sobre la intervención preventiva.PALABRAS CLAVE: Prevención de consumo de drogodependencias, intervención familiar, factores de pronóstico, participación parental.ABSTRACT: Substance use and misuse are very common in adolescence. Parents play an important part in substance use, both through inducing risk or promoting protection and resilience. Family-based interventions have proven to be a useful approach to prevent adolescent substance use and other youth problem behaviors. However, low participation rates are an important threat to the validity of family-based preventive interventions. It has long been recognized that one of the major problems in imp...

show abstract

Section: Objeto Y Alcance De La Presente Revisión Bibliográficamentioning

confidence: 73%

Participación parental en intervenciones familiares para prevenir drogodependencias: una revisión empírica

Negreiros

2013

Ped Soc. Rev Int

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This was completed by the young person (other family members were not asked to complete this instrument). This measure has been used previously in similar populations 88,89 and has undergone extensive development and validation work. It has shown acceptable levels of internal consistency in a validation study with 1298 pupils aged 11-18 years from 16 schools in Victoria, Australia (Cronbach's alpha of 0.39 for the expressiveness scale, 0.67 for the cohesion scale and 0.72 for the conflict scale), 90 test-retest reliability of each subscale of at least 0.73 and good content and construct validity.…”

Section: Important People Drug and Alcohol Interviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Youth social behaviour and network therapy (Y-SBNT): adaptation of a family and social network intervention for young people who misuse alcohol and drugs – a randomised controlled feasibility trial

Watson

Toner

Day

et al. 2017

Health Technol Assess

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundFamily interventions appear to be effective at treating young people’s substance misuse. However, implementation of family approaches in UK services is low. This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of recruiting young people to an intervention based on an adaptation of adult social behaviour and network therapy. It also sought to involve young people with experience of using substance misuse services in the research process.ObjectivesTo demonstrate the feasibility of recruiting young people to family and social network therapy and to explore ways in which young people with experience of using substance misuse services could be involved in a study of this nature.DesignA pragmatic, two-armed, randomised controlled open feasibility trial.SettingTwo UK-based treatment services for young people with substance use problems, with recruitment taking place from May to November 2014.ParticipantsYoung people aged 12–18 years, newly referred and accepted for structured interventions for drug and/or alcohol problems.InterventionsA remote, web-based computer randomisation system allocated young people to adapted youth social behaviour and network therapy (Y-SBNT) or treatment as usual (TAU). Y-SBNT participants were intended to receive up to six 50-minute sessions over a maximum of 12 weeks. TAU participants continued to receive usual care delivered by their service.Main outcome measuresFeasibility was measured by recruitment rates, retention in treatment and follow-up completion rates. The main clinical outcome was the proportion of days on which the main problem substance was used in the preceding 90-day period as captured by the Timeline Follow-Back interview at 3 and 12 months.ResultsIn total, 53 young people were randomised (Y-SBNT,n = 26; TAU,n = 27) against a target of 60 (88.3%). Forty-two young people attended at least one treatment session [Y-SBNT 22/26 (84.6%); TAU 20/27 (74.1%)]; follow-up rates were 77.4% at month 3 and 73.6% at month 12. Data for nine young people were missing at both months 3 and 12, so the main clinical outcome analysis was based on 24 young people (92.3%) in the Y-SBNT group and 20 young people (74.1%) in the TAU group. At month 12, the average proportion of days that the main problem substance was used in the preceding 90 days was higher in the Y-SBNT group than in the TAU group (0.54 vs. 0.41; adjusted mean difference 0.13, 95% confidence interval –0.12 to 0.39;p = 0.30). No adverse events were reported. Seventeen young people with experience of substance misuse services were actively involved throughout the study. They informed key elements of the intervention and research process, ensuring that the intervention was acceptable and relevant to our target groups; contributing to the design of key trial documents, ideas for a new model of public involvement and this report. Two parents were also involved.ConclusionsThe adapted intervention could be delivered in young people’s services, and qualitative interviews found that Y-SBNT was acceptable to young people, family members and staff. Engagement of family and network members proved difficult within the intervention and research aspects. The study proved the feasibility of this work in routine services but outcome measurement based on narrow substance use variables may be limited and may fail to capture other important changes in wider areas of functioning for young people. Validation of the EuroQol-5 Dimensions for young people aged 12–18 years should be considered and flexible models for involvement of young people in research are required to achieve inclusive representation throughout all aspects of the research process. Although recommendation of a full trial of the Y-SBNT intervention compared with TAU is not supported, this study can inform future intervention development and UK research within routine addiction services.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN93446265.FundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full inHealth Technology Assessment; Vol. 21, No. 15. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

show abstract

“…• The Strengthening Families Program (SFP), originally a selective family-based program first developed in 1983 in Utah in the USA (Kumpfer et al 2012), was revised in 1992 into a shorter (and more universal) version (Molgaard et al 2000), the Iowa SFP. Versions of the SFP are currently being implemented in Germany, Ireland, Greece, Spain, the Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Sweden, and the UK.…”

Section: Examples Of Successful Transfermentioning

confidence: 99%

Regional and Cultural Aspects of Prevention

Simon¹,

Burkhart²

2014

Textbook of Addiction Treatment: International Perspectives

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Effectiveness of a Culturally Adapted Strengthening Families Program 12–16 Years for High-Risk Irish Families

Abstract: Background Evidence-based programs (EBPs) targeting effective family skills are the

Cited by 46 publications

References 34 publications

Participación parental en intervenciones familiares para prevenir drogodependencias: una revisión empírica

Participación parental en intervenciones familiares para prevenir drogodependencias: una revisión empírica

Youth social behaviour and network therapy (Y-SBNT): adaptation of a family and social network intervention for young people who misuse alcohol and drugs – a randomised controlled feasibility trial

Regional and Cultural Aspects of Prevention

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About