2018
DOI: 10.1016/s2352-4642(18)30062-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention of vaccine-matched and mismatched influenza in children aged 6–35 months: a multinational randomised trial across five influenza seasons

Abstract: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, we did not have vaccination data for most of our paients and the majority of available data was for pediatric patients. It is important to recall that although influenza vaccines were thought to be mostly effective for children 2 years and older, recent data showed high vaccine efficacy reaching 60% in infants as young as 6 months [36,[40][41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, we did not have vaccination data for most of our paients and the majority of available data was for pediatric patients. It is important to recall that although influenza vaccines were thought to be mostly effective for children 2 years and older, recent data showed high vaccine efficacy reaching 60% in infants as young as 6 months [36,[40][41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moderate to severe influenza disease was defined as (1) fever > 39 degree Celsius (39°C), and/or (2) physician-verified shortness of breath, pulmonary congestion, pneumonia, bronchiolitis, bronchitis, wheezing, croup, or acute otitis media, and/or (3) physician-diagnosed serious extrapulmonary complication of influenza, including myositis, encephalitis, seizure, and/or myocarditis [36].…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the ≥6 to <36 months and ≥3 to <9 years age groupings were included to be consistent with previous phase 3 efficacy studies that used the same novel M-S influenza disease classification. 5,6 We did not include race/ethnicity, influenza type, and presence of RSV co-infection in our models due to insufficient variation when stratified by outcome. Pearson's Chi-squared test (or Fisher's Exact Test) was used to determine whether there was a significant difference between mild versus M-S cases for each of the outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we used a novel influenza severity definition that has been utilized in other (non-US) clinical and observational studies [5][6][7][8] to characterize whether US children classified retrospectively as having moderate-to-severe influenza disease had an increased likelihood of utilizing healthcare, including having antibiotics or antivirals prescribed. Overall, this study found that children identified as having moderate-to-severe disease had an increased likelihood of being prescribed antibiotics, having ED visits, and subsequent outpatient visits when compared with children with mild disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation