1992
DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/49.9.2229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preventability and severity assessment in reporting adverse drug reactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
486
2
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 581 publications
(523 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
486
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The severity of the ADRs was determined using Hartwig Scale. According to this scale ADRs were assessed as mild (level 1, 2), moderate (level 3, 4, 5) and severe (level 6, 7) [2] and Preventability assessment was done using modified Schumock and Thornton criterion [3].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The severity of the ADRs was determined using Hartwig Scale. According to this scale ADRs were assessed as mild (level 1, 2), moderate (level 3, 4, 5) and severe (level 6, 7) [2] and Preventability assessment was done using modified Schumock and Thornton criterion [3].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These forms were then sent to the research team, who carried out the causality, preventability and severity assessments. Each suspected ADR was assessed for: causality using Naranjo's probability scale, severity using Hartwig's criteria, and preventability using Schumock and Thornton's criteria [12][13][14]. Naranjo's probability scale was used to evaluate the causality relationship between an ADR and a drug.…”
Section: Reporting Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preventability was assessed using the modified Schumock and Thornton scale [11] which classifies ADRs as definitely preventable, probably preventable and not preventable, respectively. The severity of the ADRs was assessed using the modified Hartwig and Siegel severity assessment scale [12] which classifies ADRs as mild, moderate and severe, respectively. The predictability of the ADRs (predictable or non-predictable) was also assessed.…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%