2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2016.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalidation trial for a novel in vitro eye irritation test using the reconstructed human cornea-like epithelial model, MCTT HCE™

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although various 3D RhCE models are widely used as in vitro alternative tests for eye irritation, these methods are critically dependent on tissue viability for distinguishing irritants from non-irritants [12][13][14][15][16], which has several limitations, including low specificity and a high false-positive rate of test results [14,17,18]. In this situation, gene expression screening for ocular irritation potential can enhance the prediction rate of a prediction model based on cell viability [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although various 3D RhCE models are widely used as in vitro alternative tests for eye irritation, these methods are critically dependent on tissue viability for distinguishing irritants from non-irritants [12][13][14][15][16], which has several limitations, including low specificity and a high false-positive rate of test results [14,17,18]. In this situation, gene expression screening for ocular irritation potential can enhance the prediction rate of a prediction model based on cell viability [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the importance as a criterion for eye irritation potential assessment in the RhCE model, assessment methods that rely solely on tissue viability still have limitations of low specificity associated with the high false-positive rate depending on the characteristics of the materials, especially for moderate to weak eye irritants [14,17,18]. Therefore, to improve the specificity and accuracy of in vitro test performance, a new additional biomarker for eye irritation should be discovered to enhance the predictive capability for eye irritation before the viability test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The water-soluble formazan forming dye, WST-1, is used to determine tissue viability for hazard classification. A threshold of tissue viability of 35% for liquids and 65% for solids was chosen to discriminate between irritants (GHS Cat 1/2) and non-irritants (GHS No Cat) (Yang et al 2017;Lim et al 2019). The MCTT HCE EIT catch-up validation database containing 30 reference chemicals met the VMG criteria for reproducibility and predictive capacity, as required by the Performance Standards of this Guideline (OECD 2019a).…”
Section: Hazard Assessment-current Status Of 3d In Vitro Eye Irritation Tests (Eit) and Regulatory Acceptancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have sought to evaluate the predictability of eye irritation through a comparative analysis between the existing Draize test method using rabbits and a human corneal model. The RhCE models could distinguish between irritants and non-irritants with high accuracy [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%