1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1997.tb15701.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalences of feline leukaemia virus and feline immunodeficiency virus infections in cats in Sydney

Abstract: The prevalence of FeLV and FIV in healthy cats may have been substantially overestimated in some previous Australian surveys. FeLV infection would appear to be a rare cause of disease in Australian cats. The higher prevalence of FIV positivity in sick as opposed to healthy cats infers that FIV infection contributes to the development of disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
72
1
7

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
8
72
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Of 94 cases tested for FeLV core antigen, only one (1%) was positive. These rates of FIV and FeLV infection were indistinguishable from a nondescript group of 'sick cats' reported in Sydney, although the prevalence of FIV was about double that of a population of 'normal healthy' cats from the same geographical area [41].…”
Section: Catsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Of 94 cases tested for FeLV core antigen, only one (1%) was positive. These rates of FIV and FeLV infection were indistinguishable from a nondescript group of 'sick cats' reported in Sydney, although the prevalence of FIV was about double that of a population of 'normal healthy' cats from the same geographical area [41].…”
Section: Catsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Similar prevalences of FeLV (0% to 2%) and FIV infection (6.5% to 7.5%) were found in a random population of healthy cats in Australia. 19 Thus, it appears unlikely that virusinduced immunosuppression initiates ORLs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This intent was specifically to complement previous and ongoing investigations into renal disease ; infectious diseases caused by feline coronavirus (Norris et al 2005, Bell et al 2006 a and, feline leukaemia virus (Malik et al 1997), feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) (Norris et al 1999, Gabor et al 2001, Norris et al 2007, Cryptococcus (O'Brien et al 2003), Nocardia and Mycobacterium (Malik et al 2002); as well as lymphosarcoma (Gabor et al 1998) and other cancers. In all of these studies, inferences concerning potential associations between disease, and age and/or gender, were based on reference populations of hospital patients, which were likely not representative of healthy normal cats.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%