2019
DOI: 10.4103/ijo.ijo_1789_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence, risk factors and pattern of severe retinopathy of prematurity in eastern Madhya Pradesh

Abstract: Purpose: To describe the prevalence, characteristics including risk factors, and pattern of severe ROP from eastern Madhya Pradesh region of India. Methods: In this 5-year retrospective study, Baseline characteristics, systemic risk factors, and findings of ROP screening were noted. Factors associated with severe ROP including aggressive posterior ROP (APROP), stage IV and V ROP were analyzed. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 20. Results: … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
23
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
23
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Necrotising enterocolitis ≥stage 2 is 11.5% and 12.6% in U.K and Indian cohort, results are comparable to the previous studies [23].Number of babies with severe Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) and number of ROP needing treatment with laser or Avastin was signi cantly higher in Indian centre (12.9% vs 7.7%) despite higher gestational age of cohort than the UK centre possibly explained by difference in practices or higher risk factors. EPICure study [4] from the UK has shown an increased incidence of ROP needing treatment (Laser/Avastin) from 13% to 22%, however data from India for babies with ROP needing treatment (laser/Avastin) is between 16.6-20.7% [23,24]. Intraventricular haemorrhage grade 2 and above was 15.6% and 8.2% (p < 0.001) in U.K and India respectively which is slightly less than the previous studies [4,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Necrotising enterocolitis ≥stage 2 is 11.5% and 12.6% in U.K and Indian cohort, results are comparable to the previous studies [23].Number of babies with severe Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) and number of ROP needing treatment with laser or Avastin was signi cantly higher in Indian centre (12.9% vs 7.7%) despite higher gestational age of cohort than the UK centre possibly explained by difference in practices or higher risk factors. EPICure study [4] from the UK has shown an increased incidence of ROP needing treatment (Laser/Avastin) from 13% to 22%, however data from India for babies with ROP needing treatment (laser/Avastin) is between 16.6-20.7% [23,24]. Intraventricular haemorrhage grade 2 and above was 15.6% and 8.2% (p < 0.001) in U.K and India respectively which is slightly less than the previous studies [4,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…From various previous studies we know that PDA treatment rates depend on the individual centres, treating neonatologist and many other factors [26] The proportion of mothers who received at least one complete course of antenatal steroids was 73.4% in the U.K cohort as compared to only 37.4% in Indian cohort. According to NNAP U.K 2016 data around 86% of eligible mothers received antenatal steroids [27] and in India there is wide variation in steroid uptake rate ranging from 48% to 74% [24,28] from previous studies . The low rate in Indian cohort perhaps presumed to be due to more high risk mother where there was not enough time to give antenatal steroid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average proportion of ROP in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) based studies ranges from 2.3% to 30.1% in India. [ 13 14 ] These figures are an indirect indicator of the efficiency of the local healthcare system. The proportion of ROP among infants in our series is towards the lower range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preterm neonates being a heterogeneous group, baseline risk of ROP was divided into 2 categories based on incidence of ROP at different gestations reported in Indian studies: those at high risk (about one-third of screened need treatment, eg, neonates born at <32 weeks of gestation) and those at low risk of ROP (about 10% of screened need treatment, eg, neonates born at 32 to 36 weeks of gestation but are sick and are admitted in NICU/SNCU). 5, 8 - 11, 19 For every 1000 neonates screened (and treated if found eligible) versus not screened (and therefore not treated), there would be 219 fewer (95% CI: from 252 fewer to 175 fewer) cases of severe visual impairment in high-risk group neonates and 63 fewer (95% CI [72 fewer, 50 fewer]) cases of severe visual impairment in low-risk group neonates.…”
Section: Questions Evidence Summaries and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 More recent reports of incidence of ROP in India are from newer or more “peripheral” hospitals and about neonates referred from district hospitals to tertiary care centers. 10, 11…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%