2014
DOI: 10.4103/0970-2113.135763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of water pipe smoking in the city of Mashhad (North East of Iran) and its effect on respiratory symptoms and pulmonary function tests

Abstract: Background:The prevalence of water pipe (WP) smoking was studied using a standard questionnaire. Pulmonary function tests were also compared between WP smokers and non-smokers.Materials and Methods:The prevalence of WP smoking was studied using a standard questionnaire. Pulmonary function tests including forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), maximal mid-expiratory flow (MMEF), peak expiratory flow (PEF), maximal expiratory flow at 75%, 50%, and 25% of the FVC (MEF75,50,25)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies that evaluated the associations between the total number of WPs, 61 71 total weight of tobacco smoked 62 or WP-years 66 and PF parameters reported a significant moderate negative correlation with FEV 1 r∼−0.35. 61 62 66 71 Other negative correlates of the amount of WP smoked include FVC r∼−0.39, 61 71 FEF25-75, 61 62 71 peak expiratory flow 61 62 71 and FEV 1 /FVC. 62 A significant positive correlation between the amount of WPS and functional residual capacity and residual volume was also reported.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies that evaluated the associations between the total number of WPs, 61 71 total weight of tobacco smoked 62 or WP-years 66 and PF parameters reported a significant moderate negative correlation with FEV 1 r∼−0.35. 61 62 66 71 Other negative correlates of the amount of WP smoked include FVC r∼−0.39, 61 71 FEF25-75, 61 62 71 peak expiratory flow 61 62 71 and FEV 1 /FVC. 62 A significant positive correlation between the amount of WPS and functional residual capacity and residual volume was also reported.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 21 61–71 These cross-sectional studies were mostly community-based, 61–66 68–71 with one hospital-based study, 67 and were conducted in Iran, 61 71 Tunisia, 62 63 Kuwait, 64 Turkey, 65 66 Syria, 67 68 China 69 and Saudi Arabia. 71 PF was impaired as measured by FEV 1 , 61 63 69–71 FVC, 21 61 70 71 FEV 1 /FVC 66 69 70 or FEF25-75, 61 63 71 while two studies did not demonstrate impairment of these parameters. 64 67 Air trapping was reported in WP smokers in one study, 62 although other PF parameters such as total lung capacity 62 63 and DLCO 65 were not altered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These older, heavy-use waterpipe smokers have a high frequency of cough and sputum compared with nonsmokers, and these symptoms appear at an earlier age than in cigarette smokers (37,40,41). An important observation in the present study is that a significant proportion of young waterpipe smokers with a history of fewer than four waterpipe sessions per week for less than 5 years have clinical abnormalities, including an increase in cough frequency and sputum production, and, strikingly, 38% have reduced diffusing capacity.…”
Section: Clinical Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers in a number of studies have assessed lung function in older, heavy-use waterpipe users and found evidence of reduced lung function parameters, including reduced FVC, FEV 1 , maximal midexpiratory flow, peak expiratory flow, forced expiratory flow, and midexpiratory phase levels, as well as FEV 1 /FVC, compared with nonsmokers, with a correlation between the duration and quantity of waterpipe smoking and the abnormalities of pulmonary function (3,11,37,38). These older, heavy-use waterpipe smokers have a high frequency of cough and sputum compared with nonsmokers, and these symptoms appear at an earlier age than in cigarette smokers (37,40,41).…”
Section: Clinical Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation