2018
DOI: 10.4103/ijpr.ijpr_23_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of three-rooted primary mandibular second molars in Karnataka (South Indian) population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the overall prevalence of RE was 9.23%; this is relatively higher than the other studies conducted on Indian population groups [17,18,19,20,21]. It was observed that three patients had bilateral RE presentation (1.15%), 13 cases had left RE (5%) and 5 cases had right RE (3.08%).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…In the present study, the overall prevalence of RE was 9.23%; this is relatively higher than the other studies conducted on Indian population groups [17,18,19,20,21]. It was observed that three patients had bilateral RE presentation (1.15%), 13 cases had left RE (5%) and 5 cases had right RE (3.08%).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…7 Recent Indian studies performed using intraoral periapical radiographs showed that 5.6–6.5% Indian children had three-rooted deciduous mandibular molars. 8 , 9 In Taiwan, 21–27% of the surveyed patient populations had three-rooted permanent mandibular first molars. 10 , 11 However limited information has been reported in the literature regarding the correlation between the occurrence of three-rooted deciduous mandibular second molars and three-rooted permanent mandibular first molars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for the difference in the results of the mentioned studies with the present study can be attributed to the exclusion of the first and second primary molars from the target samples in the study of Nagaveni et al [ 25 ] and Tu et al [ 17 ], respectively, as well as racial diversities between Taiwanese [ 17 ], Indian [ 16 , 25 ], Korean [ 26 ], and southeast Iranian population [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Tu et al considered the prevalence of extra roots in only mandibular first primary molars, and it was reported to be 4.93% [ 17 ]. In a similar study conducted by Nagaveni et al, only mandibular second primary molars were examined and the total occurrence of third root among the study participants was 6.5% [ 25 ]. In another study by Srivathsa, the overall prevalence was 5.6%, of which 71.4% was related to the first primary molars and 28.6% was related to the second primary molars [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%