2007
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of the EH1 Groucho interaction motif in the metazoan Fox family of transcriptional regulators

Abstract: Background: The Fox gene family comprises a large and functionally diverse group of forkhead-related transcriptional regulators, many of which are essential for metazoan embryogenesis and physiology. Defining conserved functional domains that mediate the transcriptional activity of Fox proteins will contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the biological function of Fox family genes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, we identified an N-terminal eh1 motif in FoxG1 as the main binding site for TLE2. Although the co-IP assay does not allow us to conclude with certainty that the interaction between FoxG1 and Groucho/TLE is direct, the eh1 motif shows the strongest conservation with known TLE binding sites (Yaklichkin et al, 2007a;Yaklichkin et al, 2007b).…”
Section: The N-terminal Eh1 Motif Is Important For Physical Associatimentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By contrast, we identified an N-terminal eh1 motif in FoxG1 as the main binding site for TLE2. Although the co-IP assay does not allow us to conclude with certainty that the interaction between FoxG1 and Groucho/TLE is direct, the eh1 motif shows the strongest conservation with known TLE binding sites (Yaklichkin et al, 2007a;Yaklichkin et al, 2007b).…”
Section: The N-terminal Eh1 Motif Is Important For Physical Associatimentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The binding of TLEs to their target transcription factors is, in most cases, mediated via their WDR domain. This domain recognises two conserved motifs in the proteins that TLEs interact with: a WRPW motif and an engrailed homology 1 (eh1) domain, FXIXXIL (reviewed by Buscarlet and Stifani, 2007;Gasperowicz and Otto, 2005), which is present in eight classes of the homeodomain protein superfamily and in more than 50% of all members of the Fox family (Buscarlet and Stifani, 2007;Gasperowicz and Otto, 2005;Yaklichkin et al, 2007b). An interaction between human TLE1 and murine or chicken Foxg1 has been mapped to a C-terminal domain of Foxg1 (Sonderegger and Vogt, 2003;Yao et al, 2001), comprising amino acids 276-336 of mouse Foxg1 (which corresponds to amino acids 229-292 in Xenopus FoxG1).…”
Section: Tle2 and Foxg1 Physically Interact Via An N-terminal Eh1 Dommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These cells give rise to the anteriormost derivatives of the CNS, including the anterior brain and stomodeum. (Yaklichkin et al, 2007). Interestingly, this conserved repressor motif is absent from the Ciona FoxC ortholog.…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA-binding motifs are similar for many forkhead transcription factors and functional diversity is determined by flanking domains that interact with distinct co-factors (Gajiwala and Burley, 2000;Overdier et al, 1994;Pierrou et al, 1994). In vivo transcriptional targets and mechanisms of regulation have not yet been determined for the majority of forkhead transcription factors, although many family members are known to associate with the Groucho co-repressor (Yaklichkin et al, 2007a;Yaklichkin et al, 2007b). In this article, we focus on understanding the mechanism of action of FOXD1, which is required for kidney development (Hatini et al, 1996;Levinson et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%