2008
DOI: 10.1086/524018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Seropositivity to Spotted Fever Group Rickettsiae and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in a Large, Demographically Diverse US Sample

Abstract: Background. Most epidemiologic studies of tick-borne rickettsial diseases in the United States are small and have limited demographic scope, making broader risk assessment difficult.Methods. We conducted a seroprevalence study of spotted fever group rickettsiae and Anaplasma phagocytophilum, the agent of human granulocytic anaplasmosis. Specimens were selected randomly from the Department of Defense Serum Repository for 10,000 diverse military personnel at various stages in their careers who were serving with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 Other studies examining background seroprevalence in northern states or among geographically widespread military personnel suggest a seroprevalence of 4% to 6%. 18,19 The diagnosis of RMSF based on a single serologic test, as predominantly occurred during the current study period, may result in the erroneous diagnosis in non-RMSF cases with historical titers from past exposures or with nonspecific cross-reactive IgM class antibodies. The reported sensitivity and specificity of single IgM tests have been reported as low as 23% and 77%, respectively, when compared with testing of IgG in paired sera, for the diagnosis of rickettsial infections in endemic areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…17 Other studies examining background seroprevalence in northern states or among geographically widespread military personnel suggest a seroprevalence of 4% to 6%. 18,19 The diagnosis of RMSF based on a single serologic test, as predominantly occurred during the current study period, may result in the erroneous diagnosis in non-RMSF cases with historical titers from past exposures or with nonspecific cross-reactive IgM class antibodies. The reported sensitivity and specificity of single IgM tests have been reported as low as 23% and 77%, respectively, when compared with testing of IgG in paired sera, for the diagnosis of rickettsial infections in endemic areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported sensitivity and specificity of single IgM tests have been reported as low as 23% and 77%, respectively, when compared with testing of IgG in paired sera, for the diagnosis of rickettsial infections in endemic areas. 20 The prevalence of anti-R. rickettsii antibodies appears to increase with age, 18,19 likely as a function of increased risk of exposure to either R. rickettsii or other rickettsial organisms over a lifetime, the effect of historical titers may be higher among adults. In the current study, children had a lower incidence rate compared with adults, but had the highest risk of fatal outcome, in contrast to prior studies that showed the highest incidence among children and placing older adults at greater risk for fatal outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In North Carolina, sera from probable cases of RMSF demonstrated greater titers for R. amblyommii than R. rickettsii, and R. amblyommii DNA has been sequenced from a tick that caused a rash in a patient. 15,16 Although seroprevalence studies of SFG rickettsial infection in the United States have been performed in the past, 17,18 there have been limited attempts to determine if SFG rickettsiae other than R. rickettsii are contributing to the increase incidence of SFG rickettsiosis. In this study, we investigated serologic human exposure to four SFG rickettsiae in Tennessee: R. rickettsii, R. montanensis, R. parkeri, and R. amblyommii.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mounting evidence suggests that infections with other species of spotted fever group rickettsiae (SFGR) may be at least partly responsible for the apparent increase in cases, which may reflect an increase in reporting or incidence or both. Seroepidemiologic surveys of adults and children in the United States show that seroprevalence to SFGR is between 6% and 12% (2,3). Because subclinical infection or mild infections with R. rickettsii are considered to be rare or even nonexistent and there is cross-reactivity among SFGR in serologic tests, exposure to other species of SFGR could account for this relatively high seroprevalence (4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%