2015
DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.12867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of orofacial dysfunction in cerebral palsy and its association with gross motor function and manual ability

Abstract: Aim To investigate the prevalence of orofacial dysfunction (OFD) and explore factors associated with OFD in young individuals with cerebral palsy (CP). Method We conducted a cross‐sectional study on a population with CP in a Swedish county (132 individuals, mean age 14y 2mo [SD 4y 5mo], range 5–22y) using the Nordic Orofacial Test – Screening (NOT‐S), Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), and Manual Ability Classification System (MACS). The NOT‐S interview was completed by 129 individuals (76 mal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(65 reference statements)
1
35
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Pooled prevalence estimates stratified by GMFCS level were: 22.0% for level I (95% CI 6.9–51.9), 36.0% for level II (95% CI 23–51.4), 36.0% for level III (95% CI 10.8–72.3), 64.4% for level IV (95% CI 44.7–80.3), and 85.7% for level V (95% CI 45.5–97.7). Data from three studies provided pooled prevalence estimates for GMFCS levels I to III combined and GMFCS levels IV to V combined . The pooled prevalence estimates were 24.3% (95% CI 12.2–42.6) and 68.7% (95% CI 54.1–80.4) respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pooled prevalence estimates stratified by GMFCS level were: 22.0% for level I (95% CI 6.9–51.9), 36.0% for level II (95% CI 23–51.4), 36.0% for level III (95% CI 10.8–72.3), 64.4% for level IV (95% CI 44.7–80.3), and 85.7% for level V (95% CI 45.5–97.7). Data from three studies provided pooled prevalence estimates for GMFCS levels I to III combined and GMFCS levels IV to V combined . The pooled prevalence estimates were 24.3% (95% CI 12.2–42.6) and 68.7% (95% CI 54.1–80.4) respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…u 93,8% stwierdzili zaburzenia ustnej fazy połykania, u 78,5% nasilone ślinienie, u 70% zaburzenia gryzienia, a u 65% zaburzenia żucia. Częstość występowania zaburzeń karmienia waha się w zależności od źródła w przedziale 39%-85% [16]. Podobne rozbieżności dotyczą oceny występowa-nia dysfagii.…”
Section: Epidemiologia Zaburzeń Karmienia W Mpdzunclassified
“…Podobne rozbieżności dotyczą oceny występowa-nia dysfagii. W najnowszych badaniach stwierdzono jej występowanie odpowiednio u 80% [16] oraz 85% osób z mpdz [17]. Zaburzenia karmienia i dysfagia mogą mieć u poszczególnych osób różne nasilenie, stąd w systemach klasyfikujących umiejętność lokomocji i manipulacji (GMFCS i MACS) bywają sytuowane na różnych poziomach, a odsetek ich występowania wzrasta od poziomu I, do poziomu V, czyli wraz ze wzrostem stopnia zaburzeń motoryki [16,17].…”
Section: Epidemiologia Zaburzeń Karmienia W Mpdzunclassified
“…Findings suggest that over 80% of children with CP have at least some degree of oral motor dysfunction [11], which can result in poor lip seal, reduced tongue movements [5], and immature jaw movements [10]. However, to date, no known study has quantified the underlying biomechanic characteristics of oromotor performance using movement kinematics during chewing in this population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%