2011
DOI: 10.5897/ajmr11.459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of intestinal parasites at Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh, India: Five-year study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
3
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of parasitic infestation was more common in females (32.11%) as compared to that in males (21.99%) but this difference was not statistically significant. Marothi andSingh (2011), Patel et al (2014) and Zemene and Shiferaw (2018) reported similar results in their study with predominance in females. In addition, the prevalence of parasitic infections was statistically insignificant with the age of children.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The prevalence of parasitic infestation was more common in females (32.11%) as compared to that in males (21.99%) but this difference was not statistically significant. Marothi andSingh (2011), Patel et al (2014) and Zemene and Shiferaw (2018) reported similar results in their study with predominance in females. In addition, the prevalence of parasitic infections was statistically insignificant with the age of children.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…[ 16 ] that demonstrated an increased incidence of helminthic intestinal parasitic infections. In agreement with our study, a few older studies by Paul et al ,[ 9 ] Choubisa and Choubisa[ 10 ] Kavathia et al ,[ 17 ] and Marothi and Singh[ 18 ] showed increased isolation of protozoan parasites from the intestinal tract. We identified a majority of Giardia lamblia (61/70, 87.14%) parasites from the stool samples included in our study followed by Entamoeba histolytica/dispar (3/70, 4.28%) which corroborates with the studies conducted by Champa and Sreeshma,[ 13 ] Patel et al .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the present study, high G. lamblia was among Bangladeshis (37.5%), but, E. histolytica was among Indians (50%) and E. coli among Palestinians (40%). A study in India, showed the following infection rates: G. lamblia (69.5%), and E. histolytica (15.7%) (Yogyata and Binita, 2011). Taha et al (2013) in Al-Madinah reported that the protozoa infection was 21.9% with G. lamblia and 17.8% with E. histolytica/ E. coli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%