1990
DOI: 10.1016/0028-2243(90)90161-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of human papillomavirus types 11, 16 and 18 in cervical swabs. A study of 1362 pregnant women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of an effect of pregnancy on HPV infection is also supported by the observation that HPV positive rates were similar across gestational stages. Although some studies have reported an increase in HPV prevalence with gestation [Czegledy et al, 1989;Rando et al, 1989;Smith et al, 1991], reports from Hording et al [1990], Chang-Claude et al [1996] and Fife et al [1999], were in accord with the present findings. It has been shown that the number of sexual partners is the most important variable affecting the risk for HPV infection [Rohan et al, 1991;Munoz et al, 1996;Tortolero-Luna, 1999].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The absence of an effect of pregnancy on HPV infection is also supported by the observation that HPV positive rates were similar across gestational stages. Although some studies have reported an increase in HPV prevalence with gestation [Czegledy et al, 1989;Rando et al, 1989;Smith et al, 1991], reports from Hording et al [1990], Chang-Claude et al [1996] and Fife et al [1999], were in accord with the present findings. It has been shown that the number of sexual partners is the most important variable affecting the risk for HPV infection [Rohan et al, 1991;Munoz et al, 1996;Tortolero-Luna, 1999].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Most of the available data on HPV prevalence among pregnant women are derived from studies based on hybridization techniques that are suboptimal in sensitivity, and the spectrum of HPV detection is often limited to a few common genotypes [Fife et al, 1987[Fife et al, , 1996[Fife et al, , 1999Schneider et al, 1987;Rando et al, 1989;Hording et al, 1990;Chang-Claude et al, 1996;Morrison et al, 1996;Armbruster-Moraes et al, 2000]. In this study, the association between pregnancy and HPV prevalence was examined using the most sensitive catch-all detection method, consensus primer-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR), followed by an identification system that covers all the known genotypes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of HPV DNA in the genital tract of adult women has been reported in many studies. In a Danish study HPV DNA was found in 8.7 percent of 1,362 pregnant women whereas HPV DNA was found in 53 percent of a 'non-high risk population' of 13 1 women attending a family planning clinic in England (23,24). The large difference could probably partly be explained by different methods of selection and analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pregnancy seems to favor the manifestation of the condyloma acuminata since it occurs more in pregnant women than in the general population (21)(22)(23).…”
Section: Introduction Tmentioning
confidence: 99%