2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of digital dermatitis in first lactation cows assessed at breeding cattle auctions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding external biosecurity, cows in herds that purchased heifers had nearly 3 times higher odds of DD compared with cows in closed herds (Rodriguez-Lainz et al, 1999). Quarantine and hoof examinations before introducing new animals into herds are recommended, as DD was observed in 12.1% of cows presenting at auctions (Hulek et al, 2010). Herds visited by hoof trimmers who also attended other farms had 2.8 times higher odds of increased DD incidence (Wells et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding external biosecurity, cows in herds that purchased heifers had nearly 3 times higher odds of DD compared with cows in closed herds (Rodriguez-Lainz et al, 1999). Quarantine and hoof examinations before introducing new animals into herds are recommended, as DD was observed in 12.1% of cows presenting at auctions (Hulek et al, 2010). Herds visited by hoof trimmers who also attended other farms had 2.8 times higher odds of increased DD incidence (Wells et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, pens in the 2 barns were managed in the same manner, and neither barn received any other DD control or prevention, such as footbaths. In dairy cattle, outbreaks of DD on mixing of cattle can be severe with prevalences greater than or equal to 95% when no control measures are in place (Hulek et al, 2010). With the higher starting prevalence seen in Group B one might have expected the prevalence to reach higher levels as the study progressed, but this was not observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…If the information about the prevalence of the DD in a group of animals under evaluation is available, different cutpoint LESP values can then be used in the decisionmaking process of selecting these animals for further evaluation. Clear benefit of using an ELISA as a tool can be seen in dairy heifers and beef steers significantly affected by DD (Laven and Logue, 2007;Hulek et al 2010), where individual inspection of the feet of the animals may be challenging.…”
Section: Development Of the Elisa As A Diagnosticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bovine digital dermatitis (DD) is increasingly found worldwide, affecting cattle in all production systems (Hulek et al, 2010;Capion et al, 2012;Chapinal et al, 2013). Footbaths and topical treatments have been extensively used as the main preventive measures to control DD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%