Prevalence of Depression among Chinese University Students: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract

BackgroundDepression is a major mental health issue worldwide, and university students with heavy burdens of study are at a high risk for depression. While a number of studies have been conducted regarding depression among university students in China, there is a lack of information regarding the national prevalence of depression among Chinese university students. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to statistically pool the prevalence of depression among Chinese university students.MethodsA systematic search of scientific databases was conducted, including Chinese Web of Knowledge, Embase, PubMed, Wanfang (a Chinese database) and Weipu (a Chinese database) to find relevant publications published between 1995 and December 2015. This was supplemented by a secondary review of the reference lists of all retrieved papers to find additional relevant citations. Studies published in either English or Chinese that provided prevalence estimates of depression in Chinese university students were considered. Prevalence estimates of each eligible study were extracted and pooled in our meta-analysis using a random-effects model.ResultsA total of 39 studies conducted between 1997 and 2015 including 32,694 university students were analyzed. Our results indicate that the overall prevalence of depression among Chinese university students is 23.8% (95% CI: 19.9%–28.5%). Substantial heterogeneity in prevalence estimates was noted. Subgroup analysis revealed that the prevalence of depression among medical students is higher than among other students.ConclusionsOverall, the prevalence of depression among Chinese university students is exceedingly high. This suggests that it is imperative that more attention be given to the development of appropriate mental healthcare strategies for university students in China.

Depressive symptoms in Chinese assembly‐line migrant workers: A case study in the shoe‐making industry

“…In the present study, the estimated prevalence of clinically significant depressive symptoms (BDI‐SF ≥ 8) was 31.7% among AMWs working in shoe‐making industry. This prevalence is higher than that found in other cohorts of Chinese general population, including urban and rural community‐residing residents (19.9% and 16%; Xiao, Ji, & Zhang, ), university students (23.8%; Lei, Xiao, Liu, & Li, ), and community older adults (23.6%; Li, Zhang, Shao, Qi, & Tian, ). Compared with the prevalence rates reported in earlier studies with samples of general migrant workers (8%‐23.7%) (Qiu et al, ; Dai et al, ; Lam & Johnston, ), this study also revealed a higher prevalence of depression in AMWs.…”

Prevalence of depressive symptoms among medical students: overview of systematic reviews

“…As for Scielo and LILACS, 94 records were found, but only one was deemed potentially eligible and this article was also found in the English database. Eventually, 10 systematic reviews and meta‐analyses were included in this overview …”

“…Similarly, Gong et al . and Lei et al . focused on students in China, and none of their studies were included in Rotenstein et al .…”

“…The use of more than one database has been recommended for conducting a literature search to acquire comprehensive results (Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA [Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses]). Searching non‐English databases is likely to be a better practice, as numerous studies included in Gong et al., Lei et al . and Pacheco et al .…”

Mental health problems among medical students in Brazil: a systematic review and meta-analysis

“…12 In a study of 62,728 medical students, the overall prevalence of depression was reported to be 28.0%. 13 Existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses on this issue have been generated for medical students from Asia, 14,15 North America, 9 English-speaking countries outside North America, 16 and more globally. 13,17 To our knowledge, only one review 18 relates to Brazilian medical students, but was limited to a range of depressive and anxiety disorders and did not include statistical analysis or provide a detailed description of methodology to enable future replication.…”