1986
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1986.0141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of dental caries and dental fluorosis in areas with negligible, optimal, and above-optimal fluoride concentrations in drinking water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
51
2
4

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
6
51
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Both scores, although significantly different, show that the prevalence of fluorosis in the two communities might not be considered a public health problem by Dean's criterion. This finding is consistent with past and present findings [Driscoll et al, 1986;Leverett, 1986;Ismail et al, 1993;Jackson et al, 1995].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both scores, although significantly different, show that the prevalence of fluorosis in the two communities might not be considered a public health problem by Dean's criterion. This finding is consistent with past and present findings [Driscoll et al, 1986;Leverett, 1986;Ismail et al, 1993;Jackson et al, 1995].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Indeed, the DMFS value in the low-fluoride area was significantly higher, and our result indicates that water fluoride may continue to provide protection even in the presence of a low prevalence of dental caries. This finding is in accordance with results from previous studies that have shown an additional benefit in caries reduction when comparing a low-to a high-fluoride community [Driscoll et al, 1983[Driscoll et al, , 1986Angelillo et al, 1990;Ismail et al, 1993;Jackson et al, 1995].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 Driscoll and colleagues found a higher proportion of teeth with severe fluorosis were decayed or filled, and attributed it to pitting of the teeth, staining or both. 9 On the other hand, a study conducted in the US on schoolchildren…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the growing population exposure to fluorides has raised concerns about po tential toxicological side effects. No increase in the prevalence of fluorosis related to dentifrice ingestion has been reported [Holm and Andersson, 1982;Soparkar and DePaola, 1985;Driscoll et al, 1986]. Nevertheless, chronical ingestion of fluoride denti frice constitutes a potential fluorosis risk in age-sus ceptible children, particularly when combined with other fluoride supplements [Whitford et al, 1987].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%