This equated to 36% of those aged ≥20 years and 67% of those aged ≥40 years within this district. Slit-lamp examination of the anterior segment and intraocular pressure measurement, followed by stereoscopic slit-lamp fundoscopy of the optic nerve was performed. Selected patients underwent automated visual field testing. The diagnosis of glaucoma was based on pre-existing definitions. Glaucoma prevalence data are presented.
Results: Seventeen individuals had glaucoma (0.90%). Causes of secondaryglaucoma were found in 4 with neovascular glaucoma, 2 with uveitic glaucoma and 4 who had developed glaucoma subsequent to trauma or surgery. The remaining 7 had no identifiable cause for their glaucoma and were thus classified as open-angle glaucoma equating to a prevalence of 0.52% (95% C.I 0.14 to 0.90) for those aged ≥40 years. Of these, 4 had an IOP ≤21 mmHg and 3 had an IOP >21 mmHg.
Conclusion:The prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among indigenous Australians within central Australia was 0.52% for those aged ≥40 years. After adjustment for the age distribution of our sample, this is one third the prevalence seen among the nonindigenous Australian population and is despite a higher prevalence of ocular parameters considered to be associated with glaucoma.