“…Hedlund and Vieweg (1984) report that this tool has been used in various populations. Although some authors suggest the use of a cutoff point of 5 (e.g., Okay, Sengül, Açikgöz, Ozan, & Dilbaz, 2010), this has also been associated with false positives (e.g., Martin, Liepman, & Young, 1990). Other studies suggest the use of a cutoff point of 8 (Horn, Paccaud, Niquille, Koehn, Magnenat, & Yersin, 1992); this threshold was chosen in this study because of its previous use with an Indigenous population in Quebec (Philippe-Labbé, 2006).…”