2016
DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000001736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence, Indications, Risk Indicators, and Outcomes of Emergency Peripartum Hysterectomy Worldwide

Abstract: Emergency peripartum hysterectomy is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality and is more frequent in lower-income countries, where it contains a higher risk of mortality. A (previous) cesarean delivery is associated with a higher risk of emergency peripartum hysterectomy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

18
146
1
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
18
146
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…These patients, after their primary cesarean delivery, will therefore inevitably proceed to a trial of VBAC, and since such a high proportion of our pa-DOI: 10.1159/000493362 tients refuse to undergo VBAC for reasons previously outlined, a second cesarean delivery will be performed which therefore adds to the high institutional cesarean delivery rate reported in this study. The decision to perform a second cesarean delivery will most likely lead to another cesarean delivery, and multiple repeat cesarean deliveries; this will ultimately lead to the complex interplay of factors leading to the various problems associated with multiple cesarean deliveries including placenta praevia/accreta, primary postpartum hemorrhage, cesarean hysterectomy, maternal morbidity, and probable maternal mortality [31][32][33]. This unfortunate trend is gradually increasing in our institution and causing great concern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These patients, after their primary cesarean delivery, will therefore inevitably proceed to a trial of VBAC, and since such a high proportion of our pa-DOI: 10.1159/000493362 tients refuse to undergo VBAC for reasons previously outlined, a second cesarean delivery will be performed which therefore adds to the high institutional cesarean delivery rate reported in this study. The decision to perform a second cesarean delivery will most likely lead to another cesarean delivery, and multiple repeat cesarean deliveries; this will ultimately lead to the complex interplay of factors leading to the various problems associated with multiple cesarean deliveries including placenta praevia/accreta, primary postpartum hemorrhage, cesarean hysterectomy, maternal morbidity, and probable maternal mortality [31][32][33]. This unfortunate trend is gradually increasing in our institution and causing great concern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing number of cesarean deliveries in a patient (which will start from a primary cesarean delivery and then repeat cesarean deliveries with no VBAC) has contributed to the rising incidences of placenta praevia/accreta with the additional consequences of primary postpartum hemorrhage, increased cesarean hysterectomy and other hazards including maternal morbidity and mortality. A recent study [31] showed that placenta praevia/accreta, a frequently reported cause of primary postpartum hemorrhage, was associated with a high risk of peripartum hysterectomy; other studies [32,33] had also reported an increased risk of hysterectomy in patients with placental pathologies (which include placenta praevia/accreta) and cesarean sections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a systematic review of 128 studies hysterectomy complicated almost 1 per1000 deliveries (11) .In this study it is 2 per 1000 deliveries. The higher prevalence in this study may be due to the reference of all high risk cases to the tertiary centre.…”
Section: Jmscr Vol||06||issue||02||page 87-92||february 2018mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same systematic review the cause for hysterectomy was placental pathology in 38%, uterine atony in 27% and uterine rupture in 26%. (11) In this study fourteen cases (77.78%) of obstetric hysterectomy were done for MAPP whereas only four (28.57%) were for atonic or traumatic pph. There was a single maternal mortality due to obstetric haemorrhage in this study.…”
Section: Jmscr Vol||06||issue||02||page 87-92||february 2018mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The abnormally invasive placenta (AIP), which usually requires a difficult caesarean hysterectomy, illustrates this point. The maternal mortality associated with emergent peripartum hysterectomy is reportedly 5.2%, although this refers to emergent surgery. AIP surgery, regardless of whether it is emergent or planned, can cause maternal death, which patients and society do not recognise.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%