2021
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and severity of perceived mental fatigability in older adults: The Long Life Family Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(14 reference statements)
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A limitation of this work is that the MrOS sample is restricted to primarily white men, most of whom have higher educational attainment and lower prevalence (24%) of greater perceived mental fatigability than other comparable cohorts (Cohen et al, 2021; Simonsick et al, 2018). We also excluded individuals without complete data (more likely to be Black or Asian, older, lower cognitive function scores, and reported worse health, all p <0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A limitation of this work is that the MrOS sample is restricted to primarily white men, most of whom have higher educational attainment and lower prevalence (24%) of greater perceived mental fatigability than other comparable cohorts (Cohen et al, 2021; Simonsick et al, 2018). We also excluded individuals without complete data (more likely to be Black or Asian, older, lower cognitive function scores, and reported worse health, all p <0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each model began with one personality trait of interest. Age was included in all models as it is known to be correlated with perceived mental fatigability (Wasson et al, 2019; Cohen et al, 2021). Covariates were entered into the four models for each personality trait one group at a time: first demographics, then psychological/behavioral factors, and last health-related conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study that reported validation results for the Dutch PFS for older adults, the Dutch version had good content validity and construct validity, but confirmatory factor analysis of the original factor structure showed poor model fit (with SRMR and CFI values of 0.29 and 0.75, respectively) [27]. In another recent study involving people with and without chronic disease, convergent validity and discriminant validity were supported for the PFS [22]. Our findings partially support the validity of the K-PFS, but future studies should investigate its construct, discriminant, and criterion validity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study showed that 71.1% of women had greater physical fatigability (M = 20.47, K-PFS Physical score ≥ 15) and that 52.6% had greater mental fatigability (M = 14.35, K-PFS Mental score ≥ 13). A previous study involving two generations of family members enriched for exceptional longevity and their spouses (N = 2355, M:73.7 years) using the same PFS instrument reported that physical fatigability prevalence was higher in older aged groups (e.g., 60-60 years: 28%, 90-108 years: 89.5%) [28], and another study involving 2,361 older adults (M:73.6 years) also showed that mental fatigability was strikingly greater with age (e.g., 60-60 years: 14.5%, 90-108 years: 67.2%) [22]. Compared to the previous two studies, we found it noteworthy that even after an average of more than 7 years, women with breast cancer (M:55.4 years) still experienced greater fatigability equivalent to very old adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation