2021
DOI: 10.1016/s2352-4642(21)00020-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and risk factors for cisplatin-induced hearing loss in children, adolescents, and young adults: a multi-institutional North American cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
53
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
53
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This report supports a recent study published which also identified the amount per dose as a risk factor for hearing loss ( 24 ). Our study can be distinguished from that report due to the following differences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This report supports a recent study published which also identified the amount per dose as a risk factor for hearing loss ( 24 ). Our study can be distinguished from that report due to the following differences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our mean time in years from the last CDDP administration to the last audiogram was 3.73 years while the previous study reported a mean of 1.5 years from the end of treatment. The increased prevalence of hearing loss as patients are followed longer and the use of the better verses worse ear may explain the difference in hearing loss observed by those investigators (43.8%) compared to our study (72.6%) (24).This late onset hearing loss particularly affects patients with established hearing loss at the completion of therapy. Thus, even mild and unilateral CDDP associated hearing loss is significant and warrants further follow-up.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Finally, we noted that the rate of SNHL in our sample aligns with a large multicenter study, conducted in a sample of 1481 patients who received cisplatin. 34 In this study, the authors demonstrated that 43.8% of all children treated for cancer developed cisplatin-induced SNHL, and that rates were even higher for brain tumor patients (50.9%), and children treated <5 years (59.4%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Finally, we noted that the rate of SNHL in our sample aligns with a large multicenter study, conducted in a sample of 1481 patients who received cisplatin. 34 In this study, the authors demonstrated that 43.8% of all children treated for cancer developed cisplatin‐induced SNHL, and that rates were even higher for brain tumor patients (50.9%), and children treated <5 years (59.4%). Based on our findings, with significantly lower perceptual reasoning and working memory identified in children treated with chemotherapy only who experience severe SNHL, these children are at risk for school problems; low working memory can affect a child's concentration and ability to follow instructions, and low perceptual reasoning can render a child less capable of using effective problem‐solving strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Moreover, as CDDP is commonly used for the therapy of NB [9][10][11]51] and soft tissue malignancies, including RMS [52][53][54], the combination of CDDP/EB5 supports the rationale for the usefulness of Bet derivatives combined with CDDP in the future development of novel therapeutic schedules. This kind of approach may potentially overcome frequently observed drug resistance and could result in the enhancement of anti-cancer activity and the reduction in toxicity and adverse effects [10,108] by a significant decrease in CDDP doses in clinical use. However, the pharmacological type of interactions between ASBDs and CDDP requires further analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%