2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(00)00310-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and regional distribution of paratuberculosis in dairy herds in the Netherlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The high prevalence levels further suggest that active disease transmission is occurring among the dairy cattle population and that available control measures are either not being implemented or not being effective. The estimated prevalence values of most of the studied pathogens broadly agree with those reported from other countries, where these pathogens are considered endemic, suggesting similar pathogen dynamics [BVDV and BHV-1 (Kampa et al, 2004;Sayers et al, 2015;Fernandes et al, 2016), MAP (Muskens et al, 2000;van Schaik et al, 2003), C. burnetii (van Engelen et al, 2014), Salmonella spp., and Leptospira Hardjo (Habing et al, 2012;O'Doherty et al, 2013). Higher-prevalence estimates of F. hepatica (Cringoli et al, 2002;Olsen et al, 2015) and N. caninum infections were estimated in our study compared with some other countries (Sanderson et al, 2000;O'Doherty et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The high prevalence levels further suggest that active disease transmission is occurring among the dairy cattle population and that available control measures are either not being implemented or not being effective. The estimated prevalence values of most of the studied pathogens broadly agree with those reported from other countries, where these pathogens are considered endemic, suggesting similar pathogen dynamics [BVDV and BHV-1 (Kampa et al, 2004;Sayers et al, 2015;Fernandes et al, 2016), MAP (Muskens et al, 2000;van Schaik et al, 2003), C. burnetii (van Engelen et al, 2014), Salmonella spp., and Leptospira Hardjo (Habing et al, 2012;O'Doherty et al, 2013). Higher-prevalence estimates of F. hepatica (Cringoli et al, 2002;Olsen et al, 2015) and N. caninum infections were estimated in our study compared with some other countries (Sanderson et al, 2000;O'Doherty et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Increased prevalence of infectious agents is commonly associated with increased group size in cattle, e.g. paratuberculosis prevalence is strongly associated with increased herd size [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Netherlands, the seroprevalence was estimated to be 54.7% at the herd level and 2.5% at the animal level (30). Given the uncertainties in the performance with regard to sensitivity and specificity of the tests used, the true prevalence in the Dutch study was estimated to be between 30% and 70% at the herd level and between 2.7% and 6.9% at the animal level.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Paratuberculosismentioning
confidence: 99%