2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and proliferation of antibiotic resistance genes in two municipal wastewater treatment plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
193
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 490 publications
(245 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
18
193
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation is the formation of biofilm on pipe surfaces and in deposited sediments along the sewer system (Chen, Leung & Hung, 2003), another possibility is that the presence of multiple antibiotics, heavy metals or xenobiotics in wastewater, even at very low concentrations is selecting for A. cryaerophilus , which contains multiple ARGs (Heberer, 2002; Hawkey & Jones, 2009; Gullberg et al, 2014; Jutkina et al, 2016). Similar to our observation, selection for antibiotic resistant bacteria has been described from other wastewater treatment plants (Goñi Urriza et al, 2000; Czekalski et al, 2012; Mao et al, 2015); consequently, constant monitoring of both pre- and post-treatment sewage is warranted because of the risk of reintroducing bacteria replete with ARGs and virulence factors into natural environments (Fahrenfeld et al, 2013; Czekalski, Gasco & Burgmann, 2014; Mao et al, 2015; Pehrsson et al, 2016). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…A possible explanation is the formation of biofilm on pipe surfaces and in deposited sediments along the sewer system (Chen, Leung & Hung, 2003), another possibility is that the presence of multiple antibiotics, heavy metals or xenobiotics in wastewater, even at very low concentrations is selecting for A. cryaerophilus , which contains multiple ARGs (Heberer, 2002; Hawkey & Jones, 2009; Gullberg et al, 2014; Jutkina et al, 2016). Similar to our observation, selection for antibiotic resistant bacteria has been described from other wastewater treatment plants (Goñi Urriza et al, 2000; Czekalski et al, 2012; Mao et al, 2015); consequently, constant monitoring of both pre- and post-treatment sewage is warranted because of the risk of reintroducing bacteria replete with ARGs and virulence factors into natural environments (Fahrenfeld et al, 2013; Czekalski, Gasco & Burgmann, 2014; Mao et al, 2015; Pehrsson et al, 2016). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…These factors include plasmid host range (61), sludge retention times (62), stressful environmental conditions (53), and host/donor phylogenetic affiliations (63). Significant enrichment of the ratios of multiple ARGs compared to 16S rRNA genes throughout the wastewater treatment process confirms the potential for mobility and proliferation of ARGs within the activated sludge microbial communities in full-scale treatment systems (64). bla NDM-1 HGT events involving activated sludge microorganisms and soil bacteria had also been reported (8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In addition, sulfonamide (sulI and sulII)), tetracycline (tet(O), tet(T), tet(M), tet(Q), and tet(W), b-lactam (bla OXA-1 , bla OXA-2 , and bla OXA-10 ), and macrolide (ermB) resistance genes were detected based on quantitative PCR analysis in typical pharmaceutical wastewater treatment systems (Zhai et al, 2016). The maximum concentrations of ARGs detected in the final effluents of pharmaceutical WWTPs were up to 3.68 Â 10 6 copies/mL by Wang et al (2015) and 2.36 Â 10 7 copies/mL by Zhai et al (2016), respectively, which were much higher than the concentration in MWTPs as revealed by Mao et al (2015).…”
Section: Medical and Pharmaceutical Wastewatermentioning
confidence: 94%