2021
DOI: 10.1111/echo.15223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and predictors of left atrial appendage inactivity in patients of rheumatic mitral stenosis in sinus rhythm: An observational study

Abstract: Background: Systemic thromboembolism is a known complication of rheumatic mitral stenosis (RMS) in sinus rhythm (SR). Left atrial appendage (LAA), the commonest site of thrombus formation is usually hypocontractile (inactive) in such patients. We aimed to study the prevalence of LAA inactivity (LAAI) in severe RMS and assess its independent predictors. Methods:The study population consisted of 100 patients of severe RMS in SR.Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography were done to assess LAA contractil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the LAAEV as a marker for inactive LAA, our study found that a value of 25 cm/sec was the cut-off point for inactive LAA, which is consistent with Mukhopadhyay et al [29], who studied 100 patients with severe rheumatic mitral stenosis to determine the prevalence of inactive LAA, but this value is higher than Gawako et al who defined the cut-off value of LAAEV to be 20 cm/sec, which could be a factor in predicting inactive LAA. Nonetheless, this difference could be an indicator of a different pathology [30]…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Using the LAAEV as a marker for inactive LAA, our study found that a value of 25 cm/sec was the cut-off point for inactive LAA, which is consistent with Mukhopadhyay et al [29], who studied 100 patients with severe rheumatic mitral stenosis to determine the prevalence of inactive LAA, but this value is higher than Gawako et al who defined the cut-off value of LAAEV to be 20 cm/sec, which could be a factor in predicting inactive LAA. Nonetheless, this difference could be an indicator of a different pathology [30]…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The main effect of transmitral gradient is increased afterload on LA/LAA leading to impairment of its contractility and promoting stasis. In our previous study, 20 we have already shown that mean gradient across MV ≥11 mmHg is an independent predictor of LAA stasis and in both the patient groups it was higher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…We have also shown that LAA inactivity is the only independent predictor of LASEC, a marker of LA/LAA stasis in this subset of patients. 20…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations