2016
DOI: 10.3923/ajava.2016.794.804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and Molecular Characterization of Hydatid Cyst Isolates from Cattle in Egypt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
4
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study performed in Cairo reported that 18.4% of the examined cattle were infected by CE ( 70 ). In contrast, the occurrence rate obtained in the present study was higher than those reported in cattle slaughtered in abattoirs in Assiut, Mansoura, and other provinces of Upper Egypt, where hydatid cysts were noted in 0.4, 0.068, and 0.004% of the examined animals, respectively ( 25 , 71 , 72 ). The discrepancy in the occurrence of CE in camels and cattle in the present study vs. those reported in several previous studies may be attributed to several factors, such as hygienic practices during slaughter, sex and age of the slaughtered animals, the method of detection, the geographic location, and various climatic conditions ( 25 , 45 , 73 , 74 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another study performed in Cairo reported that 18.4% of the examined cattle were infected by CE ( 70 ). In contrast, the occurrence rate obtained in the present study was higher than those reported in cattle slaughtered in abattoirs in Assiut, Mansoura, and other provinces of Upper Egypt, where hydatid cysts were noted in 0.4, 0.068, and 0.004% of the examined animals, respectively ( 25 , 71 , 72 ). The discrepancy in the occurrence of CE in camels and cattle in the present study vs. those reported in several previous studies may be attributed to several factors, such as hygienic practices during slaughter, sex and age of the slaughtered animals, the method of detection, the geographic location, and various climatic conditions ( 25 , 45 , 73 , 74 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…In accordance with the studied potential variable factors, the statistical analysis revealed that the number and type of cysts, organ involved, and fertility and viability of hydatid cysts were not significantly associated with the occurrence of the of CE in camels or cattle. The present study also showed that CE were only detected in the lungs of camels, while cysts occurred mainly in the lungs of cattle and only one cyst was reported in the liver of cattle, which is consistent with several previous reports, mainly from Egypt ( 69 , 70 , 72 ). However, some previous reports revealed that the parasite exhibited single-organ involvement, although the involvement of two organs has also been recorded, which is apparently associated with the specific geographic regions and strain of the parasite ( 25 , 76 , 77 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…There was a difference in the rate of prevalence of CE in different areas; the prevalence was high in the Lakki Marwat district as compared to Bannu and Karak. Similar trends of variation in the prevalence have been reported by other researchers [ 16 , 24 26 , 30 ], suggesting that CE prevalence varies from region to region or even in different regions/parts of the same country. Most probably this variation in the prevalence may be associated with geographical distribution, social and cultural activities of the local people, and a good sanitary system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“… Amer et al, 2015 , identified that G1 and G6 from sheep in Egypt. Abbas et al, 2016 , detected E. granulosus s. s . (G1) and E. ortleppi (G5) from cattle slaughtered at the Mansoura abattoir, Egypt.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Egypt, most samples collected from camels slaughtered at the Toukh abattoir (Qalyubia Governorate) were identified as E. canadensis (G6), and a few of these strains were identified as E. ortleppi (G5), isolated from newly imported Sudanese camels ( Abdel Aziz et al, 2016 ). Abbas et al, 2016 reported, for the first time, a cattle HC formed by the G1 sheep strain and another cyst formed by the G5 strain (a cattle strain). Additionally, the G1 sheep strain was detected in both Egyptian camel and sheep ( Amer et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%