2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2004.06.127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pretreatment options for large scale SWRO plants: case studies of OF trials at Kindasa, Saudi Arabia, and conventional pretreatment in Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An SDI range of 2-4 is typically required by membrane manufacturers for conventional pretreatment. UF/MF has a reported SDI range of 0.8-2.2 [50,99,107,112,119,126], and beachwells have reported values of 0.4-2.8 [58, 60, Tables 3 to 7, page 29ff.]. Concerning ecological impact, it is assumed that the open intakes of UF and conventional pretreatment systems have the potential to cause the impingement and entrainment of marine organisms ('yes'), which is not the case for beachwell intakes ('no').…”
Section: Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…An SDI range of 2-4 is typically required by membrane manufacturers for conventional pretreatment. UF/MF has a reported SDI range of 0.8-2.2 [50,99,107,112,119,126], and beachwells have reported values of 0.4-2.8 [58, 60, Tables 3 to 7, page 29ff.]. Concerning ecological impact, it is assumed that the open intakes of UF and conventional pretreatment systems have the potential to cause the impingement and entrainment of marine organisms ('yes'), which is not the case for beachwell intakes ('no').…”
Section: Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doses ranged between 0.2-2.8 mg/l as Fe (ten studies) and 0.1-10 mg/l as FeCl 3 (ten studies). Many studies found that pre-coagulation improved the UF/MF performance in terms of UF/MF fouling or filtrate quality [e.g., 99,101,112,119]. Although UF generally performed well in terms of particles and microorganisms removal, a few studies found UF/MF to be less efficient in terms of TOC removal than conventional pretreatment [105,107], or observed irreversible fouling [122].…”
Section: Integrated Membrane Systems (Ims)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A considerable number of reports can be found in the literature associated with conventional and membrane pretreatments (Rosberg, 1997;Vial et al, 2003;Halpern et al, 2005;Bonnelye et al, 2008;Voutchkov, 2010, van Hoof et al, 1999Brehant et al, 2002;Pearce et al, 2004;Kumar et al, 2006;Xu et al, 2007;Lorain et al, 2007;Bonnelye et al, 2008;Shon et al, 2008;Salinas Rodriguez et al, 2009). Nevertheless, dosages of biocides (often chlorinated substances) are the currently employed common strategy to prevent biofouling because biocides can kill nearly all microorganisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%