2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-32441-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pretreatment Identification of Head and Neck Cancer Nodal Metastasis and Extranodal Extension Using Deep Learning Neural Networks

Abstract: Identification of nodal metastasis and tumor extranodal extension (ENE) is crucial for head and neck cancer management, but currently only can be diagnosed via postoperative pathology. Pretreatment, radiographic identification of ENE, in particular, has proven extremely difficult for clinicians, but would be greatly influential in guiding patient management. Here, we show that a deep learning convolutional neural network can be trained to identify nodal metastasis and ENE with excellent performance that surpas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
99
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
99
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, we cannot exclude the possibility that other as‐yet‐undefined imaging features may show stronger predictive value for ENE. In this regard, a machine learning approach has been reported to predict ENE with AUC of 0.91 (95% CI 0.85–0.97) . In contrast to other studies evaluating radiologic ENE, our data‐reporting sheet did not include a variable to indicate the radiologist's overall impression for the presence of ENE .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As such, we cannot exclude the possibility that other as‐yet‐undefined imaging features may show stronger predictive value for ENE. In this regard, a machine learning approach has been reported to predict ENE with AUC of 0.91 (95% CI 0.85–0.97) . In contrast to other studies evaluating radiologic ENE, our data‐reporting sheet did not include a variable to indicate the radiologist's overall impression for the presence of ENE .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Multiple studies have investigated the accuracy of CT in identifying ECS, (Table ) however, only a limited number of studies have focused on ECS in P16 + OPSCC which has implications for accuracy due to the differing clinical and radiological features, and for how this knowledge is applied to clinical practice as other cancers, such as cutaneous SCC, are readily amenable to resection. Geltzeiler et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only recently Kann et al published their study on the diagnosis of lymph node metastases and ENE in HNSCC by means of pretreatment CT images and three-dimensional deep learning neural networks (22). In this study they trained the neural network using a data set of 2,875 CT-segmented lymph node specimens and achieved diagnostic results which exceeded those of human clinicians (22). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for diagnosing ENE and lymph node metastases was 0.91 (95% CI = 0.85-0.97)-ENE of lymph node metastases could be predicted with a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 85% (22).…”
Section: Imaging and Clinical Predictors In Diagnosing Extranodal Extmentioning
confidence: 99%