2013
DOI: 10.1021/am3032579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pretreatment Control of Carbon Nanotube Array Growth for Gas Separation: Alignment and Growth Studied Using Microscopy and Small-Angle X-ray Scattering

Abstract: Aligned multiwalled carbon nanotube (CNT) arrays were prepared using chemical vapor deposition of C2H4 on Fe catalyst at 750 °C. CNT array height and alignment depends strongly on the duration of H2 pretreatment, with optimal height and alignment achieved using 10-15 min pretreatment. Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) was used to quantify the alignment, distribution, and size of the CNTs in arrays produced from varying pretreatment times and the results correlated with microscopy measurements. SAXS analysis … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(104 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HOF ( f ) calculated based on the FFT images (see the Experimental Section) was used to quantitatively describe the CNTs orientation. The f value in the aligned region equals to 0.54, consistent with other aligned multiwalled nanotube arrays ( f = 0.55) and lower than the superaligned single‐walled nanotube forests ( f = 0.85) . The f value gradually decreases across the gradient structure until 0.13 at the bottom of the film (Figure g), meaning a very random arrangement and comparable to single‐walled CNT sponge ( f = 0.13) .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…HOF ( f ) calculated based on the FFT images (see the Experimental Section) was used to quantitatively describe the CNTs orientation. The f value in the aligned region equals to 0.54, consistent with other aligned multiwalled nanotube arrays ( f = 0.55) and lower than the superaligned single‐walled nanotube forests ( f = 0.85) . The f value gradually decreases across the gradient structure until 0.13 at the bottom of the film (Figure g), meaning a very random arrangement and comparable to single‐walled CNT sponge ( f = 0.13) .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The synthetic strategy for hollow graphitic carbon nanofibers (HGCNFs) with nanometer-sized pores or channels is believed to be important for many applicationsfor example, as catalyst or sensor supports, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] as hydrogen-storage materials, 8 for gas storage, 9 and in electronic and electrochemical devices 10,11 -because of their distinctive one-dimensional (1D) structure, high structural and thermal stability, high surface area, and high electric and thermal conductivity. Several methods, such as the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) approach, [12][13][14] hydrothermal method, [15][16][17][18] and electrospinning technique, have been developed for the synthesis of HGCNFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hermans factor, which is equivalent to the average of the second Legendre polynomial, 〈 P 2 〉, is now widely accepted as an orientational order parameter suitable for systems with uniaxial symmetry. It is usually calculated from crystallite ODFs determined using wide/small angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXS/SAXS) 22–24 . Due to their high penetration depths in organic materials, X‐rays can give information about 3D orientation distributions; however, to fully analyze such distributions, the traditional pole figure method is preferred 23,25 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%